Jump to content

Simple hesitation case


bluejak

  

64 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you rebid as opener after 5S comes round to you?

    • Pass
      22
    • Double
      41
    • 5NT
      0
    • 6D
      1
    • Something else
      0


Recommended Posts

[hv=pc=n&n=s42haqjt7daqt632c&d=n&v=e&b=9&a=1d4spp4np5cp5d5spp]133|200[/hv]

 

So the question is what do you choose to call now as North? Teams of four, a multiple teams qualifier [also called Round Robin in many places], straight imps.

 

The ruling is a simple judgement one: South hesitated noticeably [agreed] over 5 and North doubled. This went two off and East asked for a ruling.

 

Do you adjust the score?

 

As you will appreciate from a comment in another thread, I was one of the four players at the table and was surprised over the ruling. But I think it is more interesting to see what everyone thinks without telling you which player I was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to double and I think it is likely to be a long run winning action. While I have good defence for my bidding to date, I still have a perfectly normal hand for it. The hesitation has removed the downside of double. I would pass because I consider it to be an L/A. If I doubled and it went to ruling, no outcome of the poll would surprise me. Did all those calls other than double and pass appear in the results? If so what did North think of the director polling the perpetrators as his 'peers'?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the question was very clear, and I am surprised you think otherwise: you are given an auction and asked "What do you rebid as opener after 5S comes round to you?". No hesitation is mentioned in the question.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would always double, with or without UI. I don't see why I'm just supposed to let someone guess to bid 4 then guess again to bid 5 all on his own and not punish him when my defense is this good. If he was that sure of making 11 tricks he would not have bid 4 and risked missing slam to begin with.
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to know the partnership understandings on 4NT and 5?

I think we can assume North showed a second suit with longer diamonds, South tried clubs and found out it was diamonds and hearts. If North had clubs, they probably would have been two cards shorter than diamonds; but if hearts, his distribution shown was pretty much what he has.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If all of what Lalldonn posted isn't enough to justify the double, how about throwing the word Lightner into the mix?

 

Most people don't play this double as Lightner, they play it as showing defensive tricks. I would never expect a club lead here.

 

(I am sure if double was Lightner, we would have been told as much in the OP)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have sympathy with South hesitating on this auction although it would probably not change my ruling on an Appeals Committee. South could have sensibly planned the auction after partner's four notrump but East's delayed five spades bid is very unusual and it is not surprising that he hesitated. Unfortunately, especially as South has not shown any values in the auction so far, the hesitation is significant.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume that EBU does not have the compulsory STOP procedure with each call at the three level or higher when both sides have made a call other than pass during the last previous round of the auction?

 

If their STOP regulation (like ours) includes a mandatory STOP in such situations then the hesitation by South is immaterial provided it does not (significantly) exceed 10 seconds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume that EBU does not have the compulsory STOP procedure with each call at the three level or higher when both sides have made a call other than pass during the last previous round of the auction?

No, the EBU rule is that there is a STOP if and only if the call being made is a jump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume that EBU does not have the compulsory STOP procedure with each call at the three level or higher when both sides have made a call other than pass during the last previous round of the auction?

 

If their STOP regulation (like ours) includes a mandatory STOP in such situations then the hesitation by South is immaterial provided it does not (significantly) exceedes 10 seconds.

 

Nope, we only have to STOP before an opening of 2C or higher, or any jump bid.

 

And as for the poll: I'll double.

 

ahydra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No hesitation is mentioned in the question.

 

But "hesitation" managed to sneak into the topic title, and I think we can imagine where the hesitation occured.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most people don't play this double as Lightner, they play it as showing defensive tricks. I would never expect a club lead here.

 

(I am sure if double was Lightner, we would have been told as much in the OP)

Sorry for using that word. My double, however, might carry an inference I am much more likely to be 2-5-6-0 as opposed to 0-5-6-2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But "hesitation" managed to sneak into the topic title, and I think we can imagine where the hesitation occured.

The thread is about a hesitation case, hence the title.

 

The poll is about the bidding sequence without the hesitation to aid the decision.

 

Is it not normal to poll the bidding without the hesitation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, but where? The moment I poll this sequence on this site everyone knows that there was a hesitation and where it was. So I treated everyone as grown-up, gave the poll, then the story, so we could get results for the poll, and views on the ruling. Are you seriously suggesting that is not what you thought this was?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I see a poll here, I read the poll. If I feel I can respond to it without reading the thread, I do so, and then I read the thread. I do not make assumptions about the reason for the poll, I simply answer the question asked.

 

In this case, I did not know there was a hesitation when I answered the poll. I did not consider answering on the assumption there was a BIT (or any other irregularity).

 

If I read the poll, and feel that it's incomplete and I need more information, I read the first post in the thread. Hopefully, that gives me enough info to respond to the poll. If it does not, I'll say so.

 

It seems to me this is the best way to handle these things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it would be nice if a few people gave an opinion as to the way they would rule, or more specifically answered the question in the OP "Do you adjust?". So far we have had 24 posts and no answers to that question, though one answer may be inferred from one post. So, do me a favour please, do you adjust?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...