Jump to content

your rebid


  

19 members have voted

  1. 1. your rebid?

    • 2c
      1
    • 2nt
      1
    • 3s
      13
    • other
      2
    • 3c
      1
    • 4s
      1


Recommended Posts

No, we don't have a gadget to show 6 spades and invite game, other than 3S.

 

Whether 1NT was forcing or not doesn't seem to matter.

 

Edit: make the hand a bit stronger, and we do have a gadget of sorts: 3N=Game and 6th spade.

Edited by aguahombre
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

....

 

Whether 1NT was forcing or not doesn't seem to matter.

 

Why doesn't it matter? The way I learned 2/1, a 2nt rebid here wd have promised 18-19 points. But in sayc it's 15-17 I think. I don't know how "standard" that is, but i met plenty people on BBO playing it like me, even without prior agreement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why doesn't it matter? The way I learned 2/1, a 2nt rebid here wd have promised 18-19 points. But in sayc it's 15-17 I think. I don't know how "standard" that is, but i met plenty people on BBO playing it like me, even without prior agreement.

Did you notice the hand is not 5-3-3-2?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. I don't think it's unreasonable to at least consider a 2NT rebid in MPs.

In that case, the fact that 1NT was Forcing does indeed matter.

 

SAYC does allow for a 2NT rebid with 15-17, but in SAYC 1NT is not forcing, SO:

 

Since we are in a 2/1 style, considering a 2NT rebid is considering a misstatement of both our points and our number of spades. Whether that is reasonable to do is up to you. I would rather not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that case, the fact that 1NT was Forcing does indeed matter.

 

SAYC does allow for a 2NT rebid with 15-17, but in SAYC 1NT is not forcing, SO:

 

Since we are in a 2/1 style, considering a 2NT rebid is considering a misstatement of both our points and our number of spades. Whether that is reasonable to do is up to you. I would rather not.

 

Yup :) Now you see why I said 1nt forcing matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would strongly consider 2N, since 17 with a decent 6-bagger sure feels like 18, plus if partner has Qxx(xx) opp my Ax, it's protected on lead. But I think 3S is pretty normal as well.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our problem is that we are worth three and a half spades. Neither 2 nor 2NT helps to solve that problem. 2 followed by three spades suggests a weaker spade suit, not this hand. I would bid 3, but 4 is tempting.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This hand is right in between 3 and 3. I think 3 is enough as partner will expect 15-17 and 6 spade cards with a semi solid suit. 6 controls is only slightly rich. Can't count on 5 losers yet. I recall we play 3N hoere as solid spades usually 7 cards long.

 

2N is either 18-19 balanced or Mekstroth Extension (Articifial 18+ GF). Do not like 2N with this hand.

 

(Usually when I bid 3C with this hand partner has his A and out 1NT flyer, while when I bid 3 partner has a void for me with 2 red queen/jacks and 3 small clubs..... :blink: )

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hand was

 

x,T8x,KJ9x,Axxxx

 

 

 

KQT9xx,Ax,Ax,KJx

O.K. Still doesn't change opener's rebid. Responder does whatever he chooses afterward, which wasn't part of the question in this thread ---reassured in the aftermath that opener is or is not a mastermind

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...