whereagles Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 [hv=d=w&v=b&w=saq974hq962dq85ck&e=s3ha53dak643ca432]266|100|Scoring: IMPBBO tournament hand You're playing 2/1[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lowerline Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 [hv=d=w&v=b&w=saq974hq962dq85ck&e=s3ha53dak643ca432]266|100|Scoring: IMPBBO tournament hand You're playing 2/1[/hv]Playing 2/1 Italian style: 1♠ 2♥(1)2♠(2) 2NT(3)3♦ 3♥(4)3♠(5) 3NTpass 1 = 4-7 3crd ♠ OR GF 5+crd ♦2 = 11-16 any3 = GF 5♦4♣4 = cue5 = good suit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chamaco Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 1♠:2♦2♥:3♣3♦:3NT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtfanclub Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 1♠:2♦2♥:3♣3♦:3NT Same for me, except opener bids 3NT instead of 3♦. I want the lead going around to me in all four suits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chamaco Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 1♠:2♦2♥:3♣3♦:3NT Same for me, except opener bids 3NT instead of 3♦. I want the lead going around to me in all four suits. 3♣ is fourth suit forcing, does not promise anything in clubs.So opener with stiff K should not (yet) bid NT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flytoox Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 1♠:2♦2♥:3♣3♦:3NT dont worry about club then? pd is marked with singleton. I would prefer 5D here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 1S 2D2H 2N3D 3H3N p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chamaco Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 1S 2D2H 2N 2N must guarantee 2+ cards in pard's first suit (or exceptionaly a stiff honor) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 I don´t agree with you, 2NT is just a further ask to me, doesn´t promise really anything. 1♠-2♦2♥-3♣3♦-3♥3NT 2NT would be great if partner has 5404, but I am happy with natural 3♣, I don´t wanna receeive the lead to 3NT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chamaco Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 I don´t agree with you, 2NT is just a further ask to me, doesn´t promise really anything. It is Lawrence's version 2/1 (e.g. "Workbook on 2/1" adn "Uncontested auction"), which is the starting point of Gitelman's 2/1, and which is usually preferred to Hardy's version by experts 2/1 players. It states specifically that 2NT guarantees at least a doubleton in pard's suit (or exceptionally a stiff honor). Of course, nowadays anyone has their own gadgets and their own way to play it, but for undiscussed auctions, usually Lawrence is the reference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 Many people use 2NT here (these days), as a general "tell me more" kind of bid, trying to extract more information from opener. For these people, 2NT is sort of automatic and says nothing about responder's hand. I think a lot of the 2NT bidders here use it this way as opposed to showing specifically a balanced hand. Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PriorKnowledge Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 Notes:1)1S 2D2H 3C 3C is not 4SF. You already have a GF. 3C is natural. There is no reason to play this any other way. 2) 1S 2D2H 2N/3N2N = 12-14 or 18-19... With 18-19 responder will bid 4N over 3N3N = 15-17 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 I'd probably stumble into 6♦: 1♠ - 2♦2♥ - 3♣3♦ - 3♥3N - 4♣4♦ - 4♥4N - 5♥6♣ - 6♦ Yes I can see it plays awkwardly, but it seems to me that I'll make if either major King is on my left and trumps are 3-2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted November 18, 2004 Author Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 Either?? How can you test both simultaneously?? :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 Either?? How can you test both simultaneously?? :rolleyes: You can play low to the heart queen, and if that fails, you can then try the spade hook, in theory at least. There is some problems with getting locked in dummy on a trump back when the heart King loses.. as it makes it difficult to ruff two clubs in dummy. So if the heart Queen loses to the King, you not only need 3-2 diamonds, you need 4-3 spades with king on side, I think. Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 Notes:1)1S 2D2H 3C 3C is not 4SF. You already have a GF. 3C is natural. There is no reason to play this any other way. 2) 1S 2D2H 2N/3N2N = 12-14 or 18-19... With 18-19 responder will bid 4N over 3N3N = 15-17 You seem to have the same references as me :). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luke warm Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 for better or worse, i agree with phil... i think i'd be in 6d Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted November 19, 2004 Report Share Posted November 19, 2004 Yeah; I think its unlucky to catch the stiff K♣ instead of a working honor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cf_John0 Posted November 19, 2004 Report Share Posted November 19, 2004 I support fast arrival of 3NT after 2/1, 'cause of no good fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbleighton Posted November 20, 2004 Report Share Posted November 20, 2004 "I support fast arrival of 3NT after 2/1, 'cause of no good fit." Agree - the small extra values cancelled by misfit. 1S-2D-2H-3NT. Peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
junyi_zhu Posted November 22, 2004 Report Share Posted November 22, 2004 1S 2D2H 2N3D 3H3N p agree, if playing straight forward 2/1, I'd bid exactly the same as Justin did. This is the only way to show club stiff honor which can be important for 3NT when partner's club stopper isn't very good. If playing my 2/1 structure, it would go like this:1S 2D2H(waiting, either balanced or minimum) 2S(waiting, no other choices, 3C need 5 clubs)2N(second waiting, no other choice, 3D need 4 diamonds, 3H need 5 hearts) 3N(now it's rather straightforward, we don't have good fit, partner is quite balanced in nature, so 3NT should be the right spot. If partner has extra and balanced, he still can bid 4NT) This sequence actually only disclosed two suits...a lot of waiting bids. hehe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.