Jump to content

Looking for Non-Natural system players


Recommended Posts

I'm thinking of having a series of "exhibition" matches, hopefully team-games at BBO, where non-natural and even experimental systems can be used, and we can watch them in progress and see how they work. Hopefully these matches will attract a lot of kibitzers. I'm also hoping that the use of them can lead to better bridge education for everyone, both watching the match and those using the systems and defending against them.

 

I would like there to be at least one pair to be using non-natural methods at each table. The match should be set up in advance, and the pairs would have to post (in here) what methods they will be playing so their opponents will have time to look and prepare a defence to them.

 

How to get partnerships together to try out experimental systems is difficult. Perhaps those who have one and want to find a partner to play it with should advertise in the "partners sought" forum - under a topic "looking for a partner to play my system". Maybe some players here will volunteer. After all, the matches are really for both exhibition and for learning, and there are no prizes for winning nor any penalty for losing.

 

As a general rule, I would like to say we will allow players to look at their system notes during the bidding and play. Doing such would not be considered cheating. However if they reach undiscussed territory they must do their best and no table-talk will be allowed.

 

Any partnerships, once formed, please put yourselves forward and we can start sorting out times for these matches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i think my f2f partner and i would like to get in on this.  i'll have to double check with his schedule, though - traditionally in the range of 5pm-8pm Eastern time (New York) works for us with more flexibility on the weekends.

 

there's a copy of our system here

Scoob, you check out the big system that Garrod / Shore play for the US junior team. It was developed by my friend Adam Meyerson. If you're interested, I'll get a copy of the notes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happy to participate... I suspect that Free or The_Hog would be willing to play as well.

 

Whats the goal... Naturalists versus Scientists or complete chaos?

at least one pair to be using non-natural methods at each table

 

Suggest not looking for naturalist versus scientist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be happy if one pair are a "we can smash your system" pair, but I don't like having to constrain either pair or team to Natural so much that they can't even use Stayman, which is what the Natural vs Science matches were.

 

Obviously, whoever is playing will be happy to play against non-standard systems even if they don't intend to play it themselves, though if we can fill the tables with all non-standard (prefer that to non-natural) system pairs, all the better. Doesn't have to mean a strong club or strong diamond. Could be a system where opening 1-level bids show less than the normal opening range, or 1 denies a 4-card major while 1 promises one, or similar.

 

It's good that I've had so much response already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, depending on timing, you have at least on MOSCITO pair...

In theory, it might even be possible to arrange for a MOSCITO team...

This sounds like a great idea. I'm personaly very interested in watching Moscito played since just this past week I was inquiring about it and have just looked over quite a few notes on it. Nice to see the practical application. And anytime I can watch Scoob play his crazy ass system I'm all for it. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'll check with mike, we play the weiss club... however, this could be potentially embarrasing since i haven't yet learned the nuances of the system... i'd like to give it a shot tho

you can relax; if llammas and i have an off day, we're usually good for 40 or 50 imps to our opps :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happy to participate... I suspect that Free or The_Hog would be willing to play as well.

 

Whats the goal... Naturalists versus Scientists or complete chaos?

Since my confirmating post is deleted, I'll confirm in a looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooonger post: B)

 

Djeez!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'll check with mike, we play the weiss club... however, this could be potentially embarrasing since i haven't yet learned the nuances of the system... i'd like to give it a shot tho

you can relax; if llammas and i have an off day, we're usually good for 40 or 50 imps to our opps :)

heheh... then we can tie for last

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need 3 pairs. We provisionally have one, luke_warm and his partner.

Then we need to talk some times.

I'm available to play with either The_Hog or Free

 

I'm pretty flexible with respect to timing, however, both of them have lives

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 pairs could be:

 

luke_warm and mike

hrothgar and Free or The_Hog

scoob and llamas

keylime and his partner

 

Weekend looks best, either Saturday evening or Sunday.

I am thinking of making it a fairly long team-game, perhaps 24 boards. Do we switch the pairs around (so they play the other opponents)? That would mean they'd need to prepare defences to both systems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Systems i wish to see here is Pavel's who posted his new evaluation system, and also tysen2k who had the idea of passing balanced hand with up to 16 hcp.

Also fantoni nunes which was discussed here would be nice to check out.

If you need a hand i'll be happy to play any system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a summary description of the system that I'll be playing with either Free or The_Hog

 

In first/second seat

 

1 = Strong, art forcing, ~15+ HCP

 

1 = 4+ Hearts, might have longer minor, ~9-14 HCP

 

1 = 4+ Spades, might have longer minor, ~9-14 HCP

 

1 = Unbalanced with 4+ Diamonds, might have longer clubs

 

1NT = 11+ - 14 balanced, could have a 5 card major

Denies 13-14 HCP and 4/5 Spades unless 4333

Denies 11+ - 12 HCP and 4/5 Hearts unless 4333

 

2 = 6+ Clubs, ~ 9 - 14 HCP

 

2 = preemptive with 4+ Diamonds and 4+ cards in either major

Could be 4432, denies 4441 or 5440

 

2 = preemptive with 4+ Hearts and (4+ Spades or 5+ Clubs)

Could be 4432, denies 4441 or 5440 shape

 

2 = preemptive with 6 spades or (4+ Spades and 5+ Clubs)

 

2N = weak 3 level preempt in either minor

 

Frequent use of relays

2/1s are natural and non-forcing

 

In third/4th seat we play Strong Club, 4 card majors, and 14-16 NTP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...