Jump to content

  

7 members have voted

  1. 1. Is leading the queen correct?

    • Yes
      6
    • Should lead the 7 instead
      1


Recommended Posts

I leaded the queen and the slam made. Should I lead the 7 instead?

 

[hv=sn=tarinel&s=SJ96HA98654DJ876C&wn=00fualfa&w=SAKQ742HJ2DQCKJ96&nn=mikl_plkcc&n=STHQ7DT9542CQ8732&en=wongkamfai&e=S853HKT3DAK3CAT54&d=n&v=e&b=41&a=P1CP1S2D2S3D4NP5HD6SPPP&p=HQHKHAH2H4HJH7H3SASTS3S6SKD2S5S9SQC2S8SJDQD4D3D6&c=12]640|480[/hv]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you led the 7, then declarer would just duck. South wouldn't X 5H without the ace, and if he has AQ then declarer is screwed anyway. So the slam will still make.

 

I would lead the 7 (leading the Q saves declarer a guess). Indeed in general, against slams it's good to falsecard on the lead. A common one is leading small from something like Axx hoping dummy has K or J, partner has Q and declarer misguesses based on "nobody underleads an Ace".

 

ahydra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suggest you spend more time reconsidering the 2 overcall.

I don't disagree with this, but I think South's bidding also leaves something to be desired. He wants a club lead, not a heart. He should not double 5, and his double of the final contract would request a club lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't disagree with this, but I think South's bidding also leaves something to be desired. He wants a club lead, not a heart. He should not double 5, and his double of the final contract would request a club lead.

 

right on target plannnng the bidding is not only for those that will play the hand:))))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would lead the 7 (leading the Q saves declarer a guess). Indeed in general, against slams it's good to falsecard on the lead.

I strongly disagree with this on this type of auction. Declarer is never going to guess wrong when partner doubled for the lead, if there is a guess. But leading the Q helps partner considerably if he holds a more normal AJTxx(x) and dummy has Kxx(x), declarer xx. You lead low, declarer plays low, partner now has to guess whether declarer has stiff Q, or doubleton Q, whether he should play for two heart tricks or if he should rise ace and play you for some trick elsewhere.

 

Falsecarding on lead has more merit vs. grands or if you hold both likely defensive tricks. Vs. small if partner is going to be involved in decisions you need him to know what's going on, so he can decide where you are getting a 2nd trick.

 

Of course I agree with other posters on the stupidity of doubling 5h and the nutty 2d overcall, although the latter didn't end up mattering on this hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I strongly disagree with this on this type of auction. Declarer is never going to guess wrong when partner doubled for the lead, if there is a guess. But leading the Q helps partner considerably if he holds a more normal AJTxx(x) and dummy has Kxx(x), declarer xx. You lead low, declarer plays low, partner now has to guess whether declarer has stiff Q, or doubleton Q, whether he should play for two heart tricks or if he should rise ace and play you for some trick elsewhere.

 

Falsecarding on lead has more merit vs. grands or if you hold both likely defensive tricks. Vs. small if partner is going to be involved in decisions you need him to know what's going on, so he can decide where you are getting a 2nd trick.

 

 

Yes - good point that falsecarding has no effect if there's been a lead-directing X.

 

ahydra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...