Jump to content

Sophisticated Slamming


Recommended Posts

x AKxxx AJ10xx Ax

 

I opened 1. Partner responded 2NT Jacoby, so I bid my stiff spade (3).

 

Partner now bid Serious 3NT!

 

This seemed extremely likely to be based upon the heart Queen, spade Ace, and a lot of stuff, so I launched into RKCB -- 4NT.

 

Partner showed the expected one KC with 5.

 

At this point, somewhat in the back of my mind out of fear that 5 would be passed, I bid 5, figuring that this would likely be worked out in a good way. Sure enough, partner bid 5NT, which seemed to show the spade King, and whether this also promised the trump Queen or that was inferred from the Serious 3NT, I was now thinking grand slam, but possbly 6NT also. 6 seemed like a logical start -- focus partner on the diamond suit.

 

Partner signed off at 6.

 

Now, I tried "Grand Slam Train Has Left the Building," bidding 5 to invite a choice between 6NT, 7, or possibly 7.

 

The lead was a club as partner tabled AKQx 10xx Kx QJxx.

 

After cleaning up my shirt, I set about analyzing this intriguing choice. Clearly, as you can see, the small slam in spades may well make, when 6 may well fail. So, a fair decision after all. granted, 6NT has play when 6 makes and 6 fails, but 6 seems more likely to induce a psychotic break when LHO holds QJxx in hearts, four spades, two small clubs, and three diamonds to the Queen, especially when I play the Jack toward Dummy. That will surely give me a much better read in 6 than 6NT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see if I can count all the "flawed" bids:

 

1) Jac2NT with only THREE trumps to the TEN .... geez.

 

2) Serious-3NT knowing wasted values in Spades ( although A K Q is nothing to scoff at -- partner can get 2 sure discards ).

 

3) After the 5S-trump Q-ask , partner SHOWS it with 5NT ( and possibly the K ) when he DOESN'T have the Q OR extra Ht length .

 

4) Failing to use 4S! kickback-RKC.... using it surely makes the Q-ask task easier.

 

5) 6S! ..... classic KenRexford .... I actually like this bid !

 

Apparently partner didn't know of Ken's favorite "multi"-2C! response for this auction... eventually showing 3 card support ( a la mike's start ) :

 

1H - 2C!

2D - 2H

3S ( splinter ) - 4D ( non-Serious cue in partner's 2nd suit, denying a -Ctrl )

4S! ( kickback -RKC ) - 5C ( 1 key )

5D ( Q-ask ) - 5H ( no Q )

6H ( may be a gamble, but partner has to have something else in or perhaps the Q or maybe Q J for his 2/1 Response ).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...