Jump to content

Is there a No Man's land for you?


nikos59

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

A question of style: suppose you hold six cards in one major

and not four cards in the other major. Is there any hand

under any combination of vulnerability-position where

you would pass because your hand is too strong for a

weak 2 but too weak for a 1-level opener?

 

Is there for you a No Man's land between 2-level and 1-level

openers?

 

In my most humble opinion, there is no such an animal.

If I have six cards in a major I open them at either 1 or 2

level (or perhaps at 3 or 4 level:). I believe that whoever

passes a six-card major with 6 hcp or more deserves

any disaster that unavoidably happens to him.

 

I just saw an example of this in BBO Vugraph, Madeira

tournament. It was Round 7, Board 6 and one team was

in slam. Only one lead could beat the slam, but the

consensus of the commentators was that this (diamond)

lead was "out of this world". But the opening leader

led an unerring diamond, beating the slam. I strongly

believe that the diamond lead was a punishment from

Above. You see, declarer was dealer, vul. against not,

and he had originally *passed* holding:

 

A5

QJ8643

10 3

K 10 5

 

Nikos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another problem hand is something like:

 

9xxxxx, A, Axx, xxx

 

You want to open but the 2 As mean that partner will not believe you have a weak 2. You open at the one level and partner bids 2, you bid 2, and you get the obvious 3NT back and you hate yourself.

 

Sean

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, there are no hands that are too strong for a weak two that aren't strong enough for a one bid, excepting the cases where the "too strong" is purely extra shape, in which case the hand qualifies for a higher preempt. I will never pass a hand that is too strong for a weak two.

 

However, this doesn't mean that I won't pass a hand that is stronger than another hand that I'd open a weak two. I would open

2S on QJTxxx xx xxx xxx and pass xxxxxx Kxx Kx Kx. The latter hand isn't too strong for a weak two, it is too defensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...