fuburules3 Posted May 17, 2012 Report Share Posted May 17, 2012 http://tinyurl.com/d7xbk6t It seems that GIB will bid 3S both with the 3 card limit raise and with 3 card spades support and a hand not good enough to bid 2S. Perhaps GIB should bid 4S here instead? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyunuS Posted May 18, 2012 Report Share Posted May 18, 2012 Wow, why in the world is the 3♠ 11-12 pts? And what a pathetic 11-12 pts it has. Well, it got to the right place, so this wasn't a bid deal. Is there some way you can think of that it wouldn't reach the right final bid with this method? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuburules3 Posted May 18, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2012 Wow, why in the world is the 3♠ 11-12 pts? And what a pathetic 11-12 pts it has. Well, it got to the right place, so this wasn't a bid deal. Is there some way you can think of that it wouldn't reach the right final bid with this method? In this auction, responder could have a "bad" limit raise and one of 3 spades and 4 spades should show that. Responder also has to have a way to bid a bad raise to 2 spades and a preference to spades. Preferably the same bid does not show all of these hand types. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgi Posted June 2, 2012 Report Share Posted June 2, 2012 Fixed behavior which allowed this. So GIB supposedly won't disguise weak hand as hand which was fitting 1NT-3♠ invitational. It will close to 4♠ with the particular hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.