Yu18772 Posted May 7, 2012 Report Share Posted May 7, 2012 http://tinyurl.com/7u7p4ja Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted May 7, 2012 Report Share Posted May 7, 2012 Looks like a bug to me. There are rules that say to bid 3N with enough for game but not enough to force to slam (14-19 HCP in this context), but they have lower priority than a rule that says to bid 2N with any balanced hand. This 2NT rule looks like it's intended for use after game forcing 2/1. In this case, 2NT is actually split-range: either minimum or slammish. Since we can't say "A or B" in explanations, we choose to show the more common minimum range. But the same rule is also getting used in the non-GF 1[♦-2♣ auction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkham Posted May 8, 2012 Report Share Posted May 8, 2012 Interesting, thanks for explanation barmar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgi Posted June 1, 2012 Report Share Posted June 1, 2012 Fixed in next update. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.