dwar0123 Posted April 26, 2012 Report Share Posted April 26, 2012 6♣ was probably a bad call, but I was doing poorly in the tourny and needed a swing. I also played poorly, but at this point I didn't care. Anyway, gib hand doesn't look anything like the description. [hv=sn=Dwar0123,~~M42027,~~M42025,~~M42026|st||md|1S24QKH357D67QC6KA%2CS56TH28JQD23C578Q%2CS7AH4D58TJKAC39TJ%2C|rh||ah|Board%2011|sv|o|mb|1C|an|Minor%20suit%20opening%20--%203%2B%20C%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%201|mb|p|mb|1D|an|One%20over%20one%20--%204%2B%20D%3B%206%2B%20total%20points%20|mb|1H|an|5%2B%20H%3B%207%2B%20HCP%3B%208%2B%20total%20points%20|mb|1S|an|3%2B%20C%3B%203-%20D%3B%203-%20H%3B%204%2B%20S%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%2012-22|mb|3H|an|4%2B%20H%3B%204-8%20total%20points%20|mb|5C|an|5%2B%20C%3B%204%2B%20D%3B%2017-18%20total%20points%20|mb|p|mb|6C|an|3%2B%20C%3B%203-%20D%3B%203-%20H%3B%204%2B%20S%3B%2021-%20HCP%3B%2016-22%20t|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|HQ|pc|H4|pc|HT|pc|H3|pc|ST|pc|SA|pc|S3|pc|S2|pc|CJ|pc|C4|pc|C6|pc|CQ|pc|H2|pc|C3|pc|H9|pc|H5|pc|C9|pc|C2|pc|CK|pc|C7|pc|CA|pc|C8|pc|CT|pc|D4|pc|SK|pc|S5|pc|S7|pc|SJ|pc|DQ|pc|D2|pc|D5|pc|D9|pc|D7|pc|D3|pc|DK|pc|S9|pc|DA|pc|S8|pc|D6|pc|C5|pc|HJ|pc|D8|pc|HK|pc|H7|pc|HA|pc|S4|pc|H8|pc|DT|pc|H6|pc|SQ|pc|S6|pc|DJ|]400|300[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbradley62 Posted April 27, 2012 Report Share Posted April 27, 2012 A hand matching the description provided for 5♣ would have bid 2♣ over 1♣, not 1♦. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwar0123 Posted April 27, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 27, 2012 A hand matching the description provided for 5♣ would have bid 2♣ over 1♣, not 1♦.So the description is a logical impossibility? Should be fixed I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyunuS Posted April 28, 2012 Report Share Posted April 28, 2012 It is logically possible though. 5+♣ 4+♦ does not necessarily mean more clubs than diamonds, so imagine a hand that had 5 clubs and 6 diamonds, then it would fit that description, but that's still not what it had. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgi Posted April 28, 2012 Report Share Posted April 28, 2012 With 5+♣ and unbalanced hand and 14+ TP GIB would bid splinter ( also with 1165 ) , and with 2245 would start with 2♣, so looks like impossible sequence to happened. It will be investigated for fix. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.