fuburules3 Posted March 4, 2012 Report Share Posted March 4, 2012 http://tinyurl.com/8xoy5tv I was a little confused by what 4C was supposed to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Bear Posted March 4, 2012 Report Share Posted March 4, 2012 http://tinyurl.com/8xoy5tv I was a little confused by what 4C was supposed to be. A better question is why did it bid 2♠ with only a 4-card suit over your reverse. Why not bid 3NT, take a preference to 3♦ or cue-bid clubs if it wouldn't bid NT? I would have taken the 4♣ bid to be showing a control in clubs, which it obviously didn't have. Playing in 5♠ is a crime when the hand is cold for 6♦. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbradley62 Posted March 4, 2012 Report Share Posted March 4, 2012 Why is the 3♠ bid limited to 17 or fewer HCP? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigpenz Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 after cue bidding then asking for aces with a void i might be confused about that 4NT callsomehow i doubt its exclusion blackwood Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbradley62 Posted March 5, 2012 Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 It appears to me that OP meant to bid an honest RKC, since he "knew" that North had ♣A, so he could include that in his count. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuburules3 Posted March 5, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2012 It appears to me that OP meant to bid an honest RKC, since he "knew" that North had ♣A, so he could include that in his count. Yes, for better or worse, my intention was to bid slam if we had enough keycards (subtracting one from response due to A of clubs). Perhaps if their were a forum to discuss bad/weird bids I make, my partners would post in it <_< Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgi Posted March 8, 2012 Report Share Posted March 8, 2012 http://tinyurl.com/8xoy5tv I was a little confused by what 4C was supposed to be. 2♠ is wrong here , which respectively lead to other bad choice after it simulated badly for 4♣ showing fake Ace. It will be fixed. A better question is why did it bid 2♠ with only a 4-card suit over your reverse. Why not bid 3NT, take a preference to 3♦ or cue-bid clubs if it wouldn't bid NT? I would have taken the 4♣ bid to be showing a control in clubs, which it obviously didn't have. Playing in 5♠ is a crime when the hand is cold for 6♦.For GIB 3NT is limited to 8-11HCP, so as GIB having 12HCP should pick initially 3♣ rebid 4SF as can't find other bid to give with no fit in opener's suits Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.