Jump to content

JEC m03-b10


Recommended Posts

[hv=lin=pn|zzayats,apron,benlessard,Moki%20011|st%7C%7Cmd%7C4SAH3AD236789C34JK%2CS78TH2568TJQDJCQA%2CS236QKH47KD4QKC6T%2C%7Crh%7C%7Cah%7CBoard%2010%7Csv%7Cb%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C1D%7Cmb%7C1H%7Cmb%7Cd%21%7Can%7C4%2BS%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C1S%21%7Can%7Cclubs%7Cmb%7C2H%7Cmb%7C4S%7Cmb%7Cd%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cpc%7CHQ%7Cpc%7CH4%7Cpc%7CH9%7Cpc%7CHA%7Cpc%7CSA%7Cpc%7CS7%7Cpc%7CS2%7Cpc%7CS5%7Cpc%7CD2%7Cpc%7CDJ%7Cpc%7CDK%7Cpc%7CDA%7Cpc%7CC7%7Cpc%7CC3%7Cpc%7CCQ%7Cpc%7CC6%7Cpc%7CHJ%7Cpc%7CHK%7Cpc%7CS4%7Cpc%7CH3%7Cpc%7CC5%7Cpc%7CC4%7Cpc%7CCA%7Cpc%7CCT%7Cpc%7CHT%7Cpc%7CH7%7Cpc%7CC2%7Cpc%7CD3%7Cpc%7CH8%7Cpc%7CS3%7Cpc%7CS9%7Cpc%7CD6%7Cpc%7CD5%7Cpc%7CD7%7Cpc%7CS8%7Cpc%7CD4%7Cpc%7CH6%7Cpc%7CSK%7Cpc%7CC8%7Cpc%7CD8%7Cpc%7CSQ%7Cpc%7CSJ%7Cpc%7CD9%7Cpc%7CST%7Cpc%7CDQ%7Cpc%7CDT%7Cpc%7CCJ%7Cpc%7CH2%7Cpc%7CS6%7Cpc%7CC9%7Cpc%7CCK%7Cpc%7CH5%7C]400|300|[/hv]

 

We used to play system on if opponents decided to X or make the 1st step overcall. However since the odds taht opps keep bidding is too high we have change it. (partner tough is was relaying (i was showing S) he was showing clubs over the relay I tought he had 3s.

 

Our 1D is unbalanced 11-23,What do you prefer

 

1D--(1H)--??

 

a) standard

X= 4S

1S = 5

1Nt nat

etc

 

b) transfers (wich is ours main philosophy in general)

 

X= 4 or 5S

1S = values (5C+2/3D) may not have a stopper

1NT = clubs

2C = weak or GF D raise

2D = INV raise

2H= 6S weak or GF

2S= 6S inv

 

c) keeping the relays so that if 4th seat pass we will be able to inv and stop at 2m, or to play in right m if opener has both m.

 

X= relay

1S = 5 NF (we should probably make an exception and play that 1S is forcing and can be only 4 but im trying to downsize exceptions)

1NT = clubs

2C = weak or GF D raise

2D = inv

 

lost 13 here but i know we will fix this soon so its no big deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of these choices, I like standard the best. After 1D (1H) there's a high likelihood of partner having four or more spades just as after P P there is a high likelihood of him having a good hand. I think it's useful to split his hand between four and five+ and the split is probably something like 60/40. Since 1D is natural, partner (with a minimum) is likely to be able to compete with 1N or 2D. 1N as natural with a stopper is useful because it rightsides notrump...and opener can often raise to game since 1D is so wide-ranging. The other thing about dbl as 4 only spades is that you can use the 1S rebid as something other than 3 spades.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scheme 2 seems pretty good.

 

What about Pass = weak balanced OR game forcing relay? Unbalanced weaker hands would make a direct bid to show their suit, likely NF. Since opener is unbalanced with diamonds, it seems pretty unlikely the auction would die at 1 anyway. You'd need to reorganize your relay responses to be semi-natural (so the weak hands can pass), and only use high responses for showing opener's hands with extra strength and/or shape.

 

1D - (1H) - ?:

 

P weak balanced or GF relay

X takeout

1S 5+ NF

1N inv balanced

2C 5+ NF

2D 3+ NF

 

and then after

 

1D - (1H) - P* - (P):

 

X extra values, no extra shape

...P always an option with the right strong hand

...1S GF relay

...1N-2D some scrambling scheme to sign off in openers' suit(s)

1S min natural

1N extra values and extra shape

2C min natural

2D min natural

2H+ various shapely hands without extra strength

 

First step relays after opener's rebid, pass or other bids are preferences with the weak hand (to play).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't see the value of 1S as 5+ nf. If you want to try to stop on a dime (and I'm not recommending this), you could use dbl as 5+ spades and 1S as 4 only spades; of course this means that after double, opener's 1S rebid will be to play and not showing some other feature.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In competition I agree that 1S NF seems problematic, however in uncontested auction the 1S NF is at least as good as 1S forcing IMO. The strenght of 1S NF is that it allow responder to make delayed 2 card raises. It also allow to bid 1S a bit lighter than in standard.

 

2263 vs 5314 It would go

 

1D-1S

2C(6D)--2D (could be up to 10 pts with a stiff D)

2S (2 cards support and 15-18 pts)

 

With a minimum hand and 2 card support we just pass 1S. Often x vs KQxxx lead to ugly 2Nt/3Nt and when you have a doubleton 2S rate to be better than 2NT. Note that relaying and bidding 2S/2Nt is a relay break showing near solid spades so for us I believe most GF hands do better with a 1H start than a 1S start, so in the end using 1S as NF seems good. Ive seen a very good pair playing 1H--1S as not forcing (they bid 2C as art GF) Ive asked if they like it they told me it worked well for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do they play Flannery? This 1H-1S nf doesn't seem right to me. We relay (2C) with GF and only four spades but respond 1S with four spades or a GF hand with 5 spades. This helps find super-fits faster in competition.

 

I can see how they respond with hands they might otherwise pass, but they're removing opener from a playable (1H) contract to do so. And then it seems like opener would only want to pass with a minimum hand and two spades. Just low frequency/low win imo to want a 1S response to be nf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...