Bbradley62 Posted March 1, 2012 Report Share Posted March 1, 2012 How can it be right to bid an invitational 2♥ then unilaterally bid 4♥?http://tinyurl.com/6ox45sv Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BunnyGo Posted March 1, 2012 Report Share Posted March 1, 2012 the best part was how gib went down in a cold contract by taking an anti safety play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgi Posted March 2, 2012 Report Share Posted March 2, 2012 the best part was how gib went down in a cold contract by taking an anti safety play. Double promises max passed hand as well 4+♣4+♠ suits. It's not fully shown here. As North came up with ♠A and ♣J, it was very likely for South to have ♣K and ♥Q. It looks cold now, but if you ignore alerts. It might be unlikely to get most of the points at the other place where you would expect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloa513 Posted March 3, 2012 Report Share Posted March 3, 2012 Double promises max passed hand as well 4+♣4+♠ suits. It's not fully shown here. As North came up with ♠A and ♣J, it was very likely for South to have ♣K and ♥Q. It looks cold now, but if you ignore alerts. It might be unlikely to get most of the points at the other place where you would expect.Yet you don't explain why GIB bids 4♥ after seeming to sign off at 2. The play is just another failure of the get maximum tricks criterion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.