Jump to content

Never hide 4 card major?


  

25 members have voted

  1. 1. What's your bid?

    • 1H
      21
    • forcing D raise(depends on your system)
      3
    • other
      1


Recommended Posts

Find this hand and discussion from a personal blog.

 

2/1 or sayc (should be the same in this case)

You have

K

AK87

KJ952

A98

IMP White vs. Red, partner open 1 at first seat

 

(a) What's your bid?

If I'm at the table I might already bid 1 without second thought, but it looks like there are some advantage of raising . People advocate for raising argue that fit is almost always better than and this hand most likely belongs to slam(where the difference bet. major and minor is relatively small in IMP), and opp may enter the auction with (so you want to find your fit as soon as possible).

Still, hiding 4 cards major with that quality looks weird to me.

Any opinion?

 

(b)Assume your LHO is maniac who can preempt with 6 little cards, if your answer in (a) is below 2, your LHO bid 2, partner pass, RHO 4, what's your next bid?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually there are some really good players who will bid an inverted 2m with a 4-card major; and they have methods for uncovering a major suit fit later if necessary.

 

I am not one of them; and you can take that any way you choose :rolleyes: I prefer to eliminate the search for a major early on, and concentrate on NT vs the minor suit ---and the appropriate level, without cluttering things up with the possibility we belong in some 4-4 major suit fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would start with 1. If my diamonds and clubs were reversed, I would start wtih 2[cll], but that wasn't the question. The difference between bidding 1 with a known (for me fit) and 2 with an unknown club fit, is if we don't discover a heart fit, I can force and establish diamonds. If we don't discover a club fit after 2, I can still show hearts, the stregnth of the hand, and bid out my shape reasonably.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to start with 3, a splinter in support of diamonds, & then try to drive to slam opposite the right number of keycards.

I use splinters for weaker hands with no slam interest. I would rather start with a gf 2 and leave plenty of room to determine

level/strain. We could have a slam in D,H, NT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could have a slam in D,H, NT

This is definitely the type of hand where The 4-4 heart fit takes more tricks than the 5-4 or 5-3 diamond fit. Are we really sure after an inverted diamond raise we can distinguish between a stopper sequence and a search for a new suit strain?

 

And, if we can find our major on this hand, can we get to NT on a different one?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Find this hand and discussion from a personal blog.

 

2/1 or sayc (should be the same in this case)

You have

K

AK87

KJ952

A98

IMP White vs. Red, partner open 1 at first seat

 

(a) What's your bid?

If I'm at the table I might already bid 1 without second thought, but it looks like there are some advantage of raising . People advocate for raising argue that fit is almost always better than and this hand most likely belongs to slam(where the difference bet. major and minor is relatively small in IMP), and opp may enter the auction with (so you want to find your fit as soon as possible).

Still, hiding 4 cards major with that quality looks weird to me.

Any opinion?

 

(b)Assume your LHO is maniac who can preempt with 6 little cards, if your answer in (a) is below 2, your LHO bid 2, partner pass, RHO 4, what's your next bid?

 

I am a 1 bidder, but for this hand i can understand the concerns of people who argues that it is good to start raising via inv minor or via splinter or via whatever.

 

These concerns might be;

 

-Competition may make it harder for us to set as trumps and ask aces if we start 1

 

-If in your style opener is raising 1 with 3 cards, it maybe pain in the butt to set the back as trump because most people who raise with 3 also dedicates subsequent bids to figure how many opener raised with and that if he has a good or bad hand.

 

-Starting with direct raise, you kinda give less info to opps as oppose to lets say 1-1-1.... auction.

 

So overall i can not say what they argue is illogical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And end up in a 5-4 D fit one off when 6 is cold in your 4-4 H fit. Excellent stuff!

 

Listen jack, would you let a potential 4-4 diamond fit talk you out of splintering for your partner's 1 opening? No? Then why do you think it's ridiculous that I show my 5 card support for partner's primary suit and interest in slam all with one bid?

 

I think your sarcasm is way overdone, and not helpful. Frankly, it always makes me think that you don't have any good bridge ideas, and that all you have to offer is negativity. But then again, this isn't therapy for that poor misfit Ron, it's a bridge discussion, so I digress.

 

If you show your support now, you don't have to go through some 4th suit forcing auction just to get back to diamonds, and you don't have to worry about preemption as much. You also establish your singleton spade. It will be hard to do that later in the auction with everything else you need to catch up on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use splinters for weaker hands with no slam interest. I would rather start with a gf 2 and leave plenty of room to determine

level/strain. We could have a slam in D,H, NT

 

Splinters are designed as a slam bidding tool, it doesn't make sense to me that you wouldn't use them unless you don't have slam interest. Would you explain this more completely please?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use splinters for weaker hands with no slam interest.

 

A former German internationalist taught me the following about splinters: the important thing to consider before splintering is whether you will know what to do if partner tries to sign off in game. If you will be happy to pass - good, splinter. If you will continue to explore for slam anyway - good, splinter. If you will have some doubts remaining that slam might be on but be afraid to make another move - don't splinter.

 

This is, of course, just an application of the the "consider your rebid" principle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Splinters are designed as a slam bidding tool, it doesn't make sense to me that you wouldn't use them unless you don't have slam interest. Would you explain this more completely please?

Perhaps saying I use splinters with no slam interest is wrong. I use splinters on hands where I have no further interest in slam other than the shortage and support for partner shown by the splinter. I imagine that there would be exceptions to this, but in general I find splinters take up too much room if I have another move over the shortage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Splinters are designed as a slam bidding tool, it doesn't make sense to me that you wouldn't use them unless you don't have slam interest. Would you explain this more completely please?

O.K., I will. Splinters are a picture for partner to use if partner can use the picture and move for slam. Splinters make partner the Captain. In this case, it is not only too strong for partner to judge anything accurately (thus you will have to do everything yourself, but it loses the hearts.

 

When you have a picture too wide for the frame, you don't use that frame. You use a different one.

 

There is only one situation where we splinter and then take over ourselves: when the splinter was merely a way of setting trumps for exclusion RKC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bid 1 and it has nothing to do with what's best. Our inverted minors deny a major and we detest splinters and agree not to show stiff A or K as shortness over jacoby 2nt too.

 

Just a comfortable style for us after lots of trial and error.

 

BTW, I think everyone knows what to do if the red vs. white opps bounce this into 4. This is going to be a free run auction or close to it and we have all the tools to bid it well after 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As others point out if pard raises our hearts it is going to take some sorting to find out if pard has 3 or 4 and to get back to diamonds if need be.

 

For B/I players this is tough.

 

I didn't see anyone pointing that out, but I would like to point out that this doesn't need to be tough. There is a very simple solution: have 1-1-2 promise 4 hearts, always. I understand that certain players from the USA will not believe that this is a workable solution, but I assure you that it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OTOH if pard rebids 1nt then we can rebid 3d(XYZ) as a slam try in D.

Or, with a decent set of follow-ups, regular NMF will suffice. I realize a lot of players enjoy their alphabetical toys, or 2-way checkbacks; those folks won't agree that everything can fit nicely into the 2C NMF scheme.

 

And, main reason they won't agree is because they might have rebid 1NT instead of 1S with 4 of them --- and must include showing 4 spades in their list of NMF continuations.

Edited by aguahombre
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...