Jump to content

What to bid?


Recommended Posts

I would not consider 1S, both other options are valid choice imo.

If I bid 1NT and partner transfers to and then bids 2NT or 3NT (showing only 5 of them) I will choose to play the 5-2 heart fit.

 

Yu http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 NT stands out. 1 did not even promisses five of them...

1 Spade would be fine with an unbalanced hand.

Pass would never occur to me. You can never ever show this hand type later if you pass now. Okay never ever is not right. If partner bids freely, you have no problem. But if he is strong enough to bid after you passed, you will have no problems anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you can pull off a confident 1N, then bid 1N. This will make all subsequent bidding easier, and if you bid with confidence noone respects their partner's club bids enough to actually lead them (this is only half true, but you still have decent odds)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more clubs they can run, the less likely we'll actually play in NT or that they will lead clubs. If RHO has 5 or 6 clubs, then my partner and his combine to have only 3 or 4. One of them will have a major that either they are tempted to lead, or which they can use our systems (transfers, stayman) to play in.

 

That being said, while I think 1N is the percentage action, I wouldn't criticize a partner who chose to do something different with this hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1nt for me. Playing transfers and stayman which could be on garbage along with TO doubles if they compete we are going to land in our chosen best contract with the exception of pard blasting 3nt on tricks when they can run 5 clubs.

 

If they can only run 4 we are still in with a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would pass.

 

I am quite surprised. I think it will be hard to describe our hand if we start with pass and we are at risk of missing a game. If we have a game it's 4S or 3N and I think 1S will be a good start in either case, and we are at serious risk of never finding it if we pass. If we have a partial, I doubt 1S will be a terrible start, it will induce partner to compete/bid.

 

If we were r/r I could maybe see pass since it's MP, but I think it's too pessimistic when they're white, letting them declare might be really bad. Are you just trying to avoid -200?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since I passed, I can even tell you how it continues:

(p)-p-(1]-p

(1)-x-(2)

 

Now what?

How nice on this occasion. So, we bid 4S. But, that doesn't make my pass of 1C a good thing; it just makes it irrelevant this time. We don't look for something to do directly on every hand and are quite willing to pass 1m with balanced 12, 13, 14's. But, this one is too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IANAE: I like double = 15+ bal or semi bal here, you don't need to promise a stopper like you 'need' to with a natural 1NT overcall.

 

That said, I'd overcall 1NT here playing a 'normal' overcall system. I can see 1S though but you feel a bit heavy for that call.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who think I'm advocating a pass because it worked on this hand: my bid after the double was 3 which I thought should be positive "enough" if we have a game. Partner passed and it was down 1 - he had a weak 4=5=2=2, you lose two clubs, a heart and a spade, and one or two diamonds, depending if you guess right. So, not boasting, really curious.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am quite surprised. I think it will be hard to describe our hand if we start with pass and we are at risk of missing a game. If we have a game it's 4S or 3N and I think 1S will be a good start in either case, and we are at serious risk of never finding it if we pass. If we have a partial, I doubt 1S will be a terrible start, it will induce partner to compete/bid.

 

I don't like overcalling on a so-so 4-card suit, especially when vulnerable. Partner is a passed hand and the 1C opening on our right hand side also looks bad. I don't think that 3NT is likely, certainly not 3NT from our side. If the oppponents bid hearts I can make a takeout double. If not (and partner doesn't bid), then it is not clear to me that we are better off bidding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who think I'm advocating a pass because it worked on this hand: my bid after the double was 3 which I thought should be positive "enough" if we have a game. Partner passed and it was down 1 - he had a weak 4=5=2=2, you lose two clubs, a heart and a spade, and one or two diamonds, depending if you guess right. So, not boasting, really curious.

 

After P - (1) - P - (1) we have both double and 1NT available to show the majors; depending on agreements possibly also one or both of 2 and 2 too. One of these should show a good hand and the other should show a less good hand but with some shape. Normal is to play double as the better hand and 1NT shapely but it is perfectly possible to invert the two. If partner really had a weak 4522 hand then they misbid unless such an inversion was in place. The 4 bidders (and I would have bid this too) are assuming double has its normal meaning here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...