scoob Posted October 26, 2004 Report Share Posted October 26, 2004 [hv=d=s&v=b&n=s9432hk93d5c96542&s=sahaq8752daj74caj]133|200|Scoring: IMP[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Posted October 26, 2004 Report Share Posted October 26, 2004 What is your goal contract ? 6H is not a good contract, i think most normal bidding will get you to 4/5 heart .In my system (polish club) it will begin with1♣-1♦2♥which show 8 tricks hand, partner although having a nice hand can not see a source for 12 trick, the continuation can change but i think 5H will be the limit.give me a Q more (even the Q of spade) and i might go to slam and probebly go down there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeartA Posted October 26, 2004 Report Share Posted October 26, 2004 This is a simlpe hand:1H-2H-4H. Or if you want it more complicated:1H-2H-3D-3H-3S-4H-PPP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tysen2k Posted October 26, 2004 Report Share Posted October 26, 2004 Dealer: South Vul: Both Scoring: IMP ♠ 9432 ♥ K93 ♦ 5 ♣ 96542 ♠ A ♥ AQ8752 ♦ AJ74 ♣ AJ 1[cl] - art. strong [space] 1[di] - neg 1[he] - either balanced or 2-suited with better hearts [space] 1[sp] - 2nd neg or balanced 2[di] - 5+[he], 4+[di], not GF [space] 2[he] 4[he] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flytoox Posted October 26, 2004 Report Share Posted October 26, 2004 This is a simlpe hand:1H-2H-4H. Or if you want it to more complicated:1H-2H-3D-3H-3S-4H-PPP Cant agree more. wonder what is more can be said about this hand, couldnt find. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Posted October 26, 2004 Report Share Posted October 26, 2004 <!-- PARTNERSNS begin --><table border=1> <tr> <td> <table> <tr> <td>Dealer:</td> <td> South </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Vul:</td> <td> Both </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Scoring:</td> <td> IMP </td> </tr> </table> </td> <td> <table border='1'> <tr> <th> <table> <tr> <th class='spades'>♠</th> <td> 9432 </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='hearts'>♥</th> <td> K93 </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='diamonds'>♦</th> <td> 5 </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='clubs'>♣</th> <td> 96542 </td> </tr> </table> </th> </tr> <tr> <th> <table> <tr> <th class='spades'>♠</th> <td> A </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='hearts'>♥</th> <td> AQ8752 </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='diamonds'>♦</th> <td> AJ74 </td> </tr> <tr> <th class='clubs'>♣</th> <td> AJ </td> </tr> </table> </th> </tr> </table> </td> <td> </td> </tr> </table><!-- PARTNERSNS end -->1[cl] - art. strong [space] 1[di] - neg 1[he] - either balanced or 2-suited with better hearts [space] 1[sp] - 2nd neg or balanced 2[di] - 5+[he], 4+[di], not GF [space] 2[he] 4[he] Basically opener bid 4H alone here , partner didnt show anything , only neg and second neg, and 2h maybe third neg. Maybe 3h to invite is better but not sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted October 26, 2004 Report Share Posted October 26, 2004 I like to open 2C rather light, so with my live pard I would bid it 2C 2D (0-2 controls)2H 4Hpass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tysen2k Posted October 26, 2004 Report Share Posted October 26, 2004 Basically opener bid 4H alone here , partner didnt show anything , only neg and second neg, and 2h maybe third neg. Maybe 3h to invite is better but not sure.Yeah, pretty much, but aggressive games pay off. I'll gamble that game is on given that partner has shown heart support with 2♥. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted October 26, 2004 Report Share Posted October 26, 2004 2♣ - 2♦2♥ - 3♥4♥ - All Pass 1. 2♣ = 5+ controls and 4-5 losers (usually 19-21 HCP)2. 2♦ = 0-1 control3. If pard can't cover a single loser, then no game4. Close between 3♥ and 4♦. If the hand had a 4th heart, then a splinter would be in order. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted October 26, 2004 Report Share Posted October 26, 2004 1H 2H3D 3H4H cannot even fathom a different sequence...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted October 26, 2004 Report Share Posted October 26, 2004 unless playing a strong club, of course :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearmum Posted October 27, 2004 Report Share Posted October 27, 2004 Dealer: South Vul: Both Scoring: IMP ♠ 9432 ♥ K93 ♦ 5 ♣ 96542 ♠ A ♥ AQ8752 ♦ AJ74 ♣ AJ Precision (as my husband and I play it) 1♣ 16+1♦ <82♥ lots of points ♥ suit -- forcing for 1 round3♥ not slam going -- showing 3♥4♥ Simple :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeartA Posted October 27, 2004 Report Share Posted October 27, 2004 1H 2H3D 3H4H cannot even fathom a different sequence...? This is a subsequence of what I gave :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Posted October 27, 2004 Report Share Posted October 27, 2004 I just now realise that maybe your question (ur target contract) wasnt 6H but 4H, maybe you had the bidding1♥ passWithout 4 card spade this wouldnt be that bad and if i play a system that 2h show 8-10, but 1nt is only semiforcing, pass might just be the alternative i would choose, espcially at MP. but with 4 card spade u can bid 1sp and then bid a very weak 2H (usually doublton support)I think in Ben's system they have 2c for this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeartA Posted October 27, 2004 Report Share Posted October 27, 2004 In my system, 1♠ and then 2♥ shows stronger hand and usually has 2 ♥ only. With weak hand and 3+ support of pd's opening major, I show support immediately. As for this hand, 3-card support with an honor and a stiff, 2♥ is a no-brainer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antoine Fourrière Posted October 27, 2004 Report Share Posted October 27, 2004 1♥ 3♥4♥ 3♥ suggests four trumps, but 2♥ suggests more high-card strength. I prefer partner to bid game with extra distribution rather than with extra strength. And the opponents may also get overboard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtfanclub Posted October 27, 2004 Report Share Posted October 27, 2004 [hv=d=s&v=b&n=s9432hk93d5c96542&s=sahaq8752daj74caj]133|200|Scoring: IMP[/hv] 1C (Prec) 1D(Weak)2H (8-9 tricks and good hearts) 4H (Superweak (0-4) signoff with support) I'm not even considering slam, sorry. Now, let me see what everyone else wrote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeartA Posted October 27, 2004 Report Share Posted October 27, 2004 For this hand, precision and sayc (or 2/1) makes no difference. In my version of precision, jump over 1♦ response is the same as a 2♣ opening in sayc. And this hand does not qualify for 1♣-1♦-2♥. I would bid 2♥ whether my pd opens 1♥ (sayc or 2/1 ...) or 1♣ then 1♥ over my 1♦ (precision). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted October 27, 2004 Report Share Posted October 27, 2004 1♥-1NT F1R (or 1♠ as I play it).2NT-4♥ 2NT being game forcing, 4♥ 4-7 with 3♥. OR alternativelly 1♥-pass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joker_gib Posted October 27, 2004 Report Share Posted October 27, 2004 2♥ - 2♠3♦ - 4♥ :) 2♥ : strong with ♥ (5+) and another or Muiderberg in ♠+minor2♠ relay3♦ : strong with ♥ and ♦4♥ to play ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.