Jump to content

Your bid (atb)


Recommended Posts

Well, we didn't start 3N

 

[hv=pc=n&s=sa8632hk7dakqck76&d=w&v=0&b=8&a=3cppXp4cp?]133|200[/hv]

I think we are in slam territory.

Doesn't 4! say: " I have a max pass and both 4 card majors, pick 1 ? "

 

Not knowing what 4NT would be interpreted here as ... or 4-new suit ... or 5 ... or 5, I'll just blurt out:

 

6 ... needing as little as K-4th and A-4th and shortness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have bid 3NT, but probably taken it out with North (bid 4C and hope partner does something sensible - here 4S). Not sure how you get to slam now... perhaps North tries 5C and South might bid 6S based on his Kx and the fact he has little wastage in .

 

ahydra

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The choice was 3N, X, 4 but decided I was too strong for 3N. I was planning to bid 3N over a 3 response and didn't consider what I'd do if partner bid 4.

 

4S over 3C is not an option with this terrible suit. Double then spades is possible. Will likely be best if partner responds at the 3 level. 3N is probably favourite. With a void club partner has a routine removal imo. It will be hard to reach slam after 3N though. Partner might be able to make a slam try, its unclear to me whether that is %. Partner likely has wasted club values, and may not be hugely strong. Many would bid here with a balanced 17 count.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4S over 3C is not an option with this terrible suit. Double then spades is possible. Will likely be best if partner responds at the 3 level. 3N is probably favourite. With a void club partner has a routine removal imo. It will be hard to reach slam after 3N though. Partner might be able to make a slam try, its unclear to me whether that is %. Partner likely has wasted club values, and may not be hugely strong. Many would bid here with a balanced 17 count.

 

I don't understand '4S over 3C is not an option' but 'double and then spades is possible' ? Wouldn't double then spades suggest a better hand, spade holding than a direct 4 bid? (I agree 4 is not an option I would choose with this suit)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand '4S over 3C is not an option' but 'double and then spades is possible' ? Wouldn't double then spades suggest a better hand, spade holding than a direct 4 bid? (I agree 4 is not an option I would choose with this suit)

 

No both shows good hand, direct 4 sets the trump suit, usually solid or semi solid while DBL and then bidding means he can play another suit too.

 

 

AKJT9xx

x

AQx

Kx is a 4 for me

 

AJxxxx

AK

AKxx

x

 

AQTxx

AK

AQxx

xx

 

AQxxx

AQx

AKxx

x are DBL hands for me.

 

Some people make simple overcall with some of those but i keep my overcalls maximum to 18 hcp, and if 18 it should not have prime cards imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand '4S over 3C is not an option' but 'double and then spades is possible' ? Wouldn't double then spades suggest a better hand, spade holding than a direct 4 bid? (I agree 4 is not an option I would choose with this suit)

 

This is how they thaught it in the last century. And I bet that most players still use it this way.

But "we" think that it is MUCH better to use X and a suit for a more flexible hand. It must be wrong to have 7 ways to show different spade one suiters but no convincing way to show a 5341 hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...