Jump to content

GaLwood revisited


Recommended Posts

I agree, I don't know why he called people "jackasses", and a comment about an idea would be best tailored in a nice way, if it was made.

 

I'm learning the hard way here that (1) one has to be very careful how one phrases things here; (2) any statement that can possibly be construed as arrogance or boasting will be ripped to shreds, especially if the statement is made by a relative unknown; (3) tact is at a premium here. (Interpret (3) both ways.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm learning the hard way here that (1) one has to be very careful how one phrases things here; (2) any statement that can possibly be construed as arrogance or boasting will be ripped to shreds, especially if the statement is made by a relative unknown; (3) tact is at a premium here. (Interpret (3) both ways.)

One of the problems with forum posting is that we are limited to reading the words, aided only by (sometimes) knowledge of the poster's persona derived from other posts and (sometimes) emoticons.

 

In the real face-to-face world, a very large amount of information is conveyed by body language, facial expression, tone and pitch of voice, pace of speech and so on. That usually allows the recipient of the comment to know the true intention of the speaker. We don't get that here, so it is encumbent on a poster to be careful how the post may be read. I think most of us who on occasion attempt humour end up being perceived as aggressive. Look at the way MrAce and I misunderstood some recent posts by han as an example.

 

In addition, it is easier to be scathing in one's reaction to someone else's post when you don't know the person and are not dealing with them face to face.

 

So, yes, tact is 'at a premium'. However, in the case of this OP, I think he'd have got pretty much the same response had he signed in as gnasher or JLOGIC. The contents of his post (referring to critics of his pet ideas as 'jackasses') inevitably triggered more criticism.

 

You got a fair amount of criticism when you first posted, but it is obvious that you soon recognized that you had evinced, intentionally or inadvertently, a style and attitude that wasn't seen as appropriate by your audience.....and you commendably changed your style....imagine the response had you said that your critics were 'jackasses'! :P :D

 

Instead, I think you are going to be a welcome addition to BBF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True experts of course play "advanced MGwood" where you can even show 6430 or 6403 distribution. It took me six years to work out the details of the followups in this case but it sure was worth it! I even got a real bona fide expert to play it in a 12-board BBO tournament! He only charged me 20 bucks and he said it worked really well every time it came up.

MGwood sounds like a useful system; I don't have a bid for that hand. Could you please direct me to the web site so I can learn more about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, I don't know why he called people "jackasses", and a comment about an idea would be best tailored in a nice way, if it was made.

 

Also, if I remember correctly it was not a "very few" who took the time and effort to suggest ways to make the system more playable. Quite a few offered helpful suggestions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...