Jump to content

IMP Pair decision


ArtK78

Recommended Posts

Playing in an ACBL IMP pair game on BBO last night, I picked up:

 

[hv=pc=n&w=sht75daq9763ckqjt&d=n&v=e&b=9&a=3sp4s]133|200[/hv]

 

Do you act over 4?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would just say "uncle" to the preempt and pass. I am not happy about it either but look at colors, pd may take our action more seriously than we intended (at least i would take it serious if i were him at these colors over a preempt)

 

I am aware it doesnt need much for us to make game, but also it may get ugly real easy at these colors since there is a good chance we may end up playing doubled in the wrong suit and sometimes even in our best fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pass

 

I'd be interested in Justin's take, since high level decision making is the area in which the very best are generally so much better than the run of the mill player, but, to me, bidding here is problematic mainly because, even if we have a good spot, we have no assurance that we can reach it. Make this 0=3=5=5 and I'd be happier about bidding.

 

Consider:

 

Double: most of the time, partner will have nowhere to go and we'd better hope he has defence. If he does bid, he'll often bid 4N, two places to play. What then? if we bid our 6 card suit, maybe we find that he was 3=4=2=4 and now he corrects to hearts. Ugh.

 

4N: we show 2 places to play, and he bids 5, which gets hammered....what do we do? We can't pull to diamonds, because that promises 4+ hearts. And what would you bid over 4N if you were partner, looking at, say, 3=4=3=3 We'd play 5x'd on a 4-3 with the good, long trump tapped at trick one and no ability to take diamond tricks.....can you spell 1700?

 

5: all of our not very large eggs in one somewhat frail basket.

 

We seem to have a choice of being a chicken or a lemming.....I'm being true to my nature......chicken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My nature is lemming and I would double though it is close. I will bid 5 over 4NT.

 

This is the sort of hand where there could easily be a double game swing or we may just increase the penalty when they are sacrificing. I'm not that worried about partner pulling when both sides are not making. The way I play he definitely will not pull with 3424.

 

Of course we could concede a big penalty or partner could bid too much, especially if he the spade ace. But I just think the cost of these is less than what we stand to lose by passing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pass, smoothly. Partner can still do something (tho did not act before). If not, defending 4 may be best - it could be a value raise with as little as 2 card support. 5 second choice (placing partner with some values in a balanced hand) but it doesn't look like the hand I have.
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arggh, just the sort of hand to annoy you. On a lot of holdings where partner is not able to bid (many with 3 small S)it is possible we could score up a slam. If this was a table match I would try and guess what the other guy would do, imp pairs pass and die with the field. There are other considerations, like who bid 4S. If it was a player who bid like they expect to make it passing is the bid of choice. Tuff problem against a good pair.
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd make a takeout double, assuming we play them. If partner passes and they make, it's only 5 IMPs, compared with 11 or 14 for not bidding game when it's making. And the times when we lose by acting can be offset against the gains from converting +50 or +100 into +100 or +300.

 

If double were "cards" or "values", I have no idea what I'd do. Luckily that's somebody else's problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you reach over and remove the redouble card from RHO's bidding box before you make your call?

 

I'd make a takeout double, assuming we play them. If partner passes and they make, it's only 5 IMPs, compared with 11 or 14 for not bidding game when it's making. And the times when we lose by acting can be offset against the gains from converting +50 or +100 into +100 or +300.

 

If double were "cards" or "values", I have no idea what I'd do. Luckily that's somebody else's problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my experience they don't redouble much on this auction, especially at this vulnerability, where RHO will tend to assume that it's his partner who has been a bit frisky. Of course, if helps if I manage to double without looking scared.

 

If RHO did redouble, I probably wouldn't sit it. Let's hope that nobody I play against is reading this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the hand:

 

http://tinyurl.com/78um9vp

 

The actual result was -800, but it could have been worse (much worse - there was a chance for 1400).

 

Spades makes 11 tricks.

 

Pretty peculiar 3 opening by the North hand (in fact, of the 40 or so times the hand was played, this was the only instance of a 3 opening, the others being 2 or pass), but that is just a comment. It certainly is not relevant to the result.

 

There was one instance of 5x -1100. In that case, the West hand had the opportunity to bid diamonds at the two level and clubs at the four level. Over 4, opposite a silent partner, the player holding this hand unilaterally bid 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...