Jump to content

Another opening lead poll


pclayton

  

23 members have voted

  1. 1. Another opening lead poll

    • Ace of spades
      0
    • Low spade
      1
    • Low heart
      15
    • Low Diamond
      0
    • King of Clubs
      7


Recommended Posts

K of C.

I take 3C as an attempt to play 3N. Lho's retreat to 3H suggests weakness there. A trump could be right as lho is showing a preference for playing in H; however my H are not that good to play a forcing game and also I am not that happy with my S holding here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With four trumps, a popular defensive stategy is to play a forcing game to force declarer to lose control. This is not the hand for that one. They played around, showing all the suits, and the avoided 3NT. They also didn't bid 4 hearts, so your partner is marked for some stregnth as well. IF they could win 9 tricks straight up, they would have taken a shot at three notrump, so they must be planning on some ruffing tricks. I will lead a heart now, and a heart everytime I get in until at least the dummy is depleted of trumps.

 

Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I'm late coming back to this one. Where I come from, the 2 call shows a forced preference, typically a doubleton. If West has a simple heart raise with spades, thats the call he makes. 3 is definitely 'patterning' out but with extras. 3 is a violent signoff, probably indicating wasted spade values. It does not promise any additional heart length.

 

They have values approaching game, and our partners might be playing 3N.

 

My 10xxx of hearts suggests that we need to establish a tap, and that spades is our tap suit. Leading the Ace isn't at all appealing, so I underled. Dummy hit:

 

Dummy hit with:

 

KJ9xx

Qx

xxx

xxx

 

Declarer put in the Jack, and pard didn't cover from Qxx :P

Declarer hooked the club losing to my King, and tried the underlead again. 9, SMALL!

 

Chalking up an embarrassing -140. Declarer's hand: x, Kxxx, AKTx, AQJx. Yes they are in a 4-2! Pard is now more aware of my proclivity to underlead aces through dummy's known suit now B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my slightly dazed state, I can't picture a holding for declarer where ducking can be right here.

Declarer is holding exactly AT, and the guy leading has Ax, Kx, or xx of hearts.

 

If he goes up third hand high, declarer takes the A and T of spades. He then leads a heart towards the queen. The A or K of hearts gets taken if available, a minor suit back to declarer and then a heart to the queen and two top spades, declarer sluffing two minor suit cards. On the other hand, if you don't go up with the Q, declarer can never make more than 3 spades. I believe there's also some cases where declarer has AT of spades and only 4 hearts where by playing it this way he can force LHO to ruff with a good trump.

 

I know it's far-fetched, but suppose your partner never, ever, upon pain of death underleads an ace. What is the harm in ducking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my slightly dazed state, I can't picture a holding for declarer where ducking can be right here.

Declarer is holding exactly AT, and the guy leading has Ax, Kx, or xx of hearts.

 

If he goes up third hand high, declarer takes the A and T of spades. He then leads a heart towards the queen. The A or K of hearts gets taken if available, a minor suit back to declarer and then a heart to the queen and two top spades, declarer sluffing two minor suit cards. On the other hand, if you don't go up with the Q, declarer can never make more than 3 spades. I believe there's also some cases where declarer has AT of spades and only 4 hearts where by playing it this way he can force LHO to ruff with a good trump.

 

I know it's far-fetched, but suppose your partner never, ever, upon pain of death underleads an ace. What is the harm in ducking?

If the guy leading has two hearts, then declaer has seven. He also has 2 spades (if you are giving him AT) and some diamonds from the bidding. it just doens't add up. Unless I have misunderstood your point.

 

If declarer has the Ace, then he lamost certainly doesn't have the Ten (given the play of Jack from dummy and partner's leading the suit). In which case covering gains.

 

Eric

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the spots are right, my low heart lead works wonders....

 

Partner has HEART AJ9, so we score 3H's it looks like (nine or jack forces the king), spade ACE, Club King and diamond Queen. Even if we drop a trick in here, it is down two... (on this bdding I don't see you ducking the first spade, EAST has bid three suits). So while it is unfortunate your partner failed to defend properly, do you think your spade lead even with an awake partner is superior to a heart? Just curious.

 

Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Declarer put in the Jack, and pard didn't cover from Qxx :D

Declarer hooked the club losing to my King, and tried the underlead again. 9, SMALL!

 

Chalking up an embarrassing -140. Declarer's hand: x, Kxxx, AKTx, AQJx. Yes they are in a 4-2! Pard is now more aware of my proclivity to underlead aces through dummy's known suit now :rolleyes:

I think you need to take this into account when underlead from A. Dummy is weak in this case, and declare is strong, so pd has his reason to duck his queen. If dummy is strong, then underlead from ace is a good idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to see how declarer could have AT of spades on this auction, and the jack from dummy holding a stiff ace is silly.

 

Declarer had K9xx I think Ben. 3 is a silly contract, basically the defense has to avoid tripping over itself and the hand gets beat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to see how declarer could have AT of spades on this auction, and the jack from dummy holding a stiff ace is silly.

 

Declarer had K9xx I think Ben. 3 is a silly contract, basically the defense has to avoid tripping over itself and the hand gets beat.

If you are ldeading from Txx, and declarer has Ax, then ducking the queen is actually the right play.

 

I am not saying pd's play is necessary correct. What I mean here is that when you decide to trick the declarer, you also have to consider pd will be tricked as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...