myprac Posted December 11, 2011 Report Share Posted December 11, 2011 [hv=sn=myprac&s=SA3HK73DK64CQ9632&wn=Robot&w=SKQT9H42DQJCKJT84&nn=Robot&n=SJ652HAQ98DAT32C5&en=Robot&e=S874HJT65D9875CA7&d=e&v=n&b=2&a=P1C(Minor%20suit%20opening%20--%203+%20C%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%201)P1H(One%20over%20one%20--%204+%20H%3B%206+%20total%20points)P1N(3-5%20C%3B%202-5%20D%3B%202-3%20H%3B%202-3%20S%3B%2012-14%20HCP)P3N(4+%20H%3B%2017-%20HCP%3B%2013+%20total%20points)PPP&p=STS2S4SAH3H2HAH6H8HTHKH4H7C4HQH5H9HJS3DJS8C2SQS5DQD2D9DKD4C8DAD7C5C7C9CTCJS6CAC3S7D6SKSJS9D3D8C6CKDTD5CQ]400|300|[/hv] The bid technically complies with the rollover spec, but doesn't really make sense. Why add 2 points for a singleton when making this bid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgi Posted December 11, 2011 Report Share Posted December 11, 2011 Seems like it must bid 2NT - 4♥ 11-12HCP in this case. It will be investigated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted December 11, 2011 Report Share Posted December 11, 2011 The bug is that it's counting total points, not HCP. Rules for bidding NT shouldn't use TP, since shortness is not helpful. But we can make the HCP requirement lower if there's a 5-card suit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.