Cascade Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 ♠ 63♥ J73♦ J32♣ A9876 Gib called this 9-11 on this auction Pass 1♣ 1♥ 3♣?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbradley62 Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 3♣ sounds preemptive to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgi Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 For the current version of GIB Pass 1♣ 1♥ 3♣ = 5+♣ 4-9TP Pass 1♣ 2♥ 3♣ = 4+♣ 9-11TP If the auction was the second, with that hand ♠63♥J73♦J32♣A9876 GIB looks upgraded its 7TP to 9 due the 5th length Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cascade Posted December 7, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 For the current version of GIB Pass 1♣ 1♥ 3♣ = 5+♣ 4-9TP Pass 1♣ 2♥ 3♣ = 4+♣ 9-11TP If the auction was the second, with that hand ♠63♥J73♦J32♣A9876 GIB looks upgraded its 7TP to 9 due the 5th length Maybe it was 2♥. The fifth club isn't really an asset when 1♣ is frequently three. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgi Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 Maybe it was 2♥. The fifth club isn't really an asset when 1♣ is frequently three. Yes, it will be adjusted for not having that difference when raising. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxhong Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 A three level 4-9 TP is totally not playable. There is simply no way for a hand with 19 HCP to move over 3C. Also, this upgrade doesn't make sense. For the current version of GIB Pass 1♣ 1♥ 3♣ = 5+♣ 4-9TP Pass 1♣ 2♥ 3♣ = 4+♣ 9-11TP If the auction was the second, with that hand ♠63♥J73♦J32♣A9876 GIB looks upgraded its 7TP to 9 due the 5th length Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 I agree with xxhong. I suggest something like: 2♣ = 7-9 4+♣3♣ = 4-6 5+♣Cue = 10+ 4+♣ I've never let a concern that partner's opening might be 3 cards stop me from preempting with 5-card support. It's simply not playable to require 6 to make a preemptive raise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.