blackshoe Posted December 8, 2011 Report Share Posted December 8, 2011 How does that help the case of those who spend less time — often almost no time — when they don't have a problem? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmcw Posted December 8, 2011 Report Share Posted December 8, 2011 At my local clubs, few bother to use the stop card. When used, it is mostly ignored by the next bidder.I do not recall the director ever being called because of failure to use the stop, nor has the director been called for someone not pausing for the appropriate time.At sectional tournaments in my area a similar pattern of indifference prevails. I would suggest that most BIT/hestitations occur during competative auctions regardless of jumps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricK Posted December 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 8, 2011 How does that help the case of those who spend less time — often almost no time — when they don't have a problem?Well that's why I say my comment was partly tongue-in-cheek. But it relates to my original assertion that 10 seconds is too long because, as Justin says, bridge is too slow as it is. I think, to cover as many potential UI cases as possible, without slowing the game down unnecessarily, the regulations for "mandatory pauses" should be something like this: On the first round every player has a mandatory pause of 2 seconds (even if they have an obvious pass they can - and should - use this time to decide what they will bid over their partner's likely openings, so they should be able to look genuinely interested in the proceedings)If both players in a partnership have passed in turn, then there are no mandatory pausesWhile an auction is "competitive" (i.e. both sides have made a bid or double in the last round) then there is a mandatory pause of 2 seconds for each player. This, I believe, forces people to pause whenever they might have something to think about, and doesn't force them to fake an interest when there is likely nothing to think about, without ever delaying the game too much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted December 8, 2011 Report Share Posted December 8, 2011 Well, that would require some regulatory changes, and that's probably not going to happen. Would this two second pause be over the players' normal tempo? If so, what do you consider to be "normal tempo"? Is it the same for everyone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricK Posted December 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 8, 2011 Well, that would require some regulatory changes, and that's probably not going to happen. Would this two second pause be over the players' normal tempo? If so, what do you consider to be "normal tempo"? Is it the same for everyone?2 second pause is 2 second pause. After that they can bid whenever they want (but UI rules obviously apply). With any luck there won't be much delay after the 2 seconds, and people will be able to fake an interest for 2 seconds if needed. How often does it take more than 4 seconds (2 from RHO, 2 from you) to decide what to do in an uncontested auction on the first round? In a contested auction 2 seconds should be sufficiently long to hide many "obvious" passes from marginal ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 How often does it take more than 4 seconds (2 from RHO, 2 from you) to decide what to do in an uncontested auction on the first round? Often enough that I notice it. Doesn't really matter; the regulation is what it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluejak Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 This doesn't seem like a good reason: it would be an even simpler rule to use the stop-card before all bids, but it would have an undesirable outcome so we don't do that even though it would make a simpler rule.Of course it would, but it would be unhelpful and unreasonable. I did not realise I needed to say it, but if I need to I shall: The reasons for jump bids is to make a very simple rule that is reasonable. Any complication makes it less likely to be followed. It is true that totally unreasonable but simpler rules are available, eg only use a stop card before 7NT bids. However, this is counter-productive. So the simplest rule that was reasonable was chosen, in a large part because of its simplicity. I think a more plausible reason is that a jump-bid by an opponent is quite likely to catch you unprepared, and so more likely to create UI unless a consistent pause is mandated.I do not agree. There are other situations where this is just as true, but such situations would complicate a simple rule. One might present the argument that if the required pause were a bit less, people would be less inclined to shorten it.I just do not believe this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricK Posted December 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 Often enough that I notice it. Doesn't really matter; the regulation is what it is.And my original question was why is it what it is? Were any other rules tried (eg 5 second pause) before 10 seconds was decided to be "correct"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 No idea. The regulation was already in place when I started playing again (I played in college, but have no recollection of regs back then). As to why, well, I could guess, but that's all it would be. The C&C committee don't confide in me. B-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vampyr Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 people will be able to fake an interest for 2 seconds if needed. Why are you banging on about this? It sounds as if you need to do something about your mannerisms if you don't want to keep getting into trouble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterAlan Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 One might present the argument that if the required pause were a bit less, people would be less inclined to shorten it.I just do not believe this.Nor do I. At the club last night, LHO opened 1♥, and the auction continued P-2♥-4♠. There were 3 Passes and the opening lead was on the table before it was time for me to pick up the stop card. But this is a club where few players play tournament bridge, and poor habits take hold. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricK Posted December 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 Why are you banging on about this? It sounds as if you need to do something about your mannerisms if you don't want to keep getting into trouble.I have never got into trouble (at least about this). I can genuinely think about a bridge hand for 10 seconds if I want, although I don't believe I change my intended call in the last 7 or so seconds; I just use the time to plan further action. But from my admittedly limited observations, there is an issue with this rule for the reasons I have mentioned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordontd Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 Nor do I. At the club last night, LHO opened 1♥, and the auction continued P-2♥-4♠. There were 3 Passes and the opening lead was on the table before it was time for me to pick up the stop card. But this is a club where few players play tournament bridge, and poor habits take hold.You're talking about players who ignore the Stop card. I was talking about those who shorten the pause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.