calm01 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 http://tinyurl.com/7rufkb2 This is a fundamental failure that occurs frequently and so is a high priority fix. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloa513 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 http://tinyurl.com/7rufkb2 This is a fundamental failure that occurs frequently and so is a high priority fix.It don't why you call it that. Its a failure to set up a suit by defence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgi Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 Why declarer can't have ♣KJ62? East still can have ♣AT and to play like that. So having ♣75 (Declarer left with K6) might decide not risk to continue. Does it look like crucial mistake? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 Even if this is high priority, it's also extremely hard to fix. There are no rules for GIB's defense, and there's no "understanding" of why partner is playing a certain way, it's all done by simulations. While it's often correct to keep playing a suit partner has led, it's not a hard and fast rule. So I wouldn't want to program this into the code without some way for it to figure out if it's right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.