Jump to content

Trick 2 defensive problem (IMPs)


jallerton

Recommended Posts

hearts 3-1 is odd, for partner to pass the double, and for declarer to play the 6 from K96.

 

If declarer is 1327 it is mandatory that partner underleads A for us to score 3 heart tricks so 10 would be the right play if he has singleton.

 

Now if partner has K98 things are harder, now declarer could have Axxx and we have to play a trump to avoid 2 ruffs in dummy if partner doesn't have a club higher than the 7.

 

 

Lets see, declarer having xK96Jx AKQ10xxx doesn´t look like a 5 bid to me, x x Axxx AKQ1098x on the other hand is more like it, so I will play a trump back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does a trump back gain if he has that hand?

Perhaps I'm missing something, but it appears to hold him to seven clubs, two diamonds, and one other trick. Even if declarer has 9, I don't think he can manage a guard squeeze, because of the diamond blockage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps I'm missing something, but it appears to hold him to seven clubs, two diamonds, and one other trick. Even if declarer has 9, I don't think he can manage a guard squeeze, because of the diamond blockage.

 

Diamond to king, heart ruff, diamond diamond ruff, heart ruff, pull trump, spade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I agree that a trump is right, I don't see an alternative... I was just tryin to pull a gnasher and point out your example was wrong ;) lol (jk gnasher!).

 

I think it's strange that you think partner having Kxx of hearts is strange, surely if he had a stiff heart he would have ripped 5C himself, and his pass was inviting us to bid, or should I be assuming that we are not in a forcing pass, and that double would have encouraged us to bid? I have never played 2/1 not GF, I would have guessed that we are in a force over a 5 level jump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh I'm dumb, the alternative is to play a spade back and get a trump promotion if declarer has x x Axxx AKT9xxx (with the same strip being about to occur) lol @ me.

 

I think this problem might come down to what we can expect from the pass of 5C, jallerton can you elaborate on whether we were in a force? Sorry if this is obvious/standard, I literally don't know how to play 2/1 non gf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

huh

 

As best as I can figure, that disarms your stated line of play of

Diamond to king, heart ruff, diamond diamond ruff, heart ruff, pull trump, spade.

While preventing 2 diamond ruffs and still leaving the K dead(ruffed if pulled before trump and inaccessible if ruffing a diamond)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As best as I can figure, that disarms your stated line of play of

 

While preventing 2 diamond ruffs and still leaving the K dead(ruffed if pulled before trump and inaccessible if ruffing a diamond)

 

 

http://phillyphilms.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/its-alive.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this problem might come down to what we can expect from the pass of 5C, jallerton can you elaborate on whether we were in a force? Sorry if this is obvious/standard, I literally don't know how to play 2/1 non gf.

 

This was an Acol sequence. 2 was forcing to 2 so partner's pass was non-forcing. If partner had doubled 5 that would have been penalties. If anyone doesn't like the double they should pretend that this is a defensive problem against 5 undoubled!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was the full deal.

 

[hv=pc=n&s=s6h6da632cakqt842&w=saqjt8hk98dj98c63&n=sk97432h754dktc75&e=s5haqjt32dq754cj9&d=w&v=b&b=4&a=1sp2h(Forcing%20to%202S)5cppdppp]399|300[/hv]

 

The winning defence is indeed to play a spade to partner's ace and for partner to play a trump back. Whilst it's true to say that I spotted this at the table, I have to admit that I was the declarer which made it somewhat easier! In practice a trump was played at trick 2 and I followed the line suggested by Justin.

 

It was good teamwork by BBO forum posters to come up with the correct line of defence, but I'd have been very impressed if my opponents had found the winning defence at the table.

 

Interestingly, as Andy hints, had the 10 been swapped with 2, the contract could still have been made even on the recommended defence. It's a pretty ending. After a spade to the ace and a trump back, declarer runs the trumps without attempting a ruff in dummy. In the 4-card end position, West has to hold on to two spades so can only keep two red cards. If he bares J his partner is exposed to a 2nd round diamond finesse. Alternatively, if he keeps 2 diamonds he has to abandon hearts. Now to the K, K squeezes East in the red suits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...