Jump to content

Matchpoint decision


BunnyGo

Recommended Posts

I'd also have opened 1S. I will now bid 5S rather than passing because my hand is significantly more suitable for playing in spades than the hand that I have shown. I will consider 5H because I would like to play in slam if p has 2 aces and something useful in a round suit. I don't think I'll play in many slams worse than trumps 1-1.
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any significance to partner's bid of 4 freely? Is this action stronger or weaker than pass? Does either/both deny or promise controls?

 

This action is his weakest possible action (since the 4 bid forced to game). It does not directly imply anything about controls, just that he has no desire to bid further or investigate anything. Pass would have been stronger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any significance to partner's bid of 4 freely? Is this action stronger or weaker than pass? Does either/both deny or promise controls?

This action is his weakest possible action (since the 4 bid forced to game). It does not directly imply anything about controls, just that he has no desire to bid further or investigate anything. Pass would have been stronger.

Probably the most popular agreement, but not as absolute as the answer sounds. Some people use pass in these situations and worst humanly possible on the auction, and 4S as a routine/offense oriented opening. The point being, it is another one of those things worthy of discussion with a regular partner rather than to be assumed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any significance to partner's bid of 4 freely? Is this action stronger or weaker than pass? Does either/both deny or promise controls?

 

I think it is still quite wide ranging as partner is opposite a passed hand. Most partner's are going to bid 4 whenever they cannot see a slam. So it could be a minimum without much in diamonds or worse a minimum with some wastage. Perhaps given the double practiced partnerships could give some thought to helping partner at the five-level if the potential 'raise' comes.

 

With regard to the original questions. I would have opened 1 and I pass now. Its not competely ideal but 5 seems too unilateral in a hand that does have some defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, in retrospect, I probably should have opened the hand. My (mistaken) thoughts were:

 

1) I don't want to pre-empt with this hand

2) It seems a bit light to open

3) I have the master suit, I can come in later and be ok

 

I did bid 5 spades (making exactly). 5DX would have been 800 on basically any defense.

 

The hand

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...