Jump to content

Rebid for 3316 19hcp after 1C-1H


bd71

Recommended Posts

[hv=pc=n&s=saj4hak2dqckq8743&d=s&v=0&b=11&a=1cp1hp]133|200[/hv]

 

What the bleep do I bid now?

 

A good partner I haven't played much with suggested a jump-shift to 2. I would assume that shows 4, but even so, is that maybe the least bad lie here?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=pc=n&s=saj4hak2dqckq8743&d=s&v=0&b=11&a=1cp1hp]133|200[/hv]

 

What the bleep do I bid now?

 

2S! as a GF gadget ( Sp may be artificial ) over 1H responses ( as suggested by gnasher awhile back but doesn't claim credit for originality ):

 

1C - 1H

2S! - 2NT! ( asks )

??

.. 3C = long Cl; Sp was artificial

.. 3D! = ( other minor ) 4 cards Sp

.. 3H = 3 cards Hts, 5+ Cl, Sp was artificial

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hand calls for creativity.

 

There are several options:

3: IMO hand is too strong for 3 - though you may want to overlook ur stiff Q.

4: Only 3card-support, but very good ones.

2NT: stiff Q is disturbing

2: Only 3cards

 

This hand is like "democracy": It is a bad political system, but the best out of the bad ones.

 

I prefer 2.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to play that 3 shows exactly this shape and range but not in my current partnership.

Similarly, 3 would show the 1-3-3-6 hand.

 

Today I bid 2 and if we land in the 4-3 it will be at least playable and may be the best spot, ie opposite KQxx, Qxxx, Jxx, Jx for all the MP's

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugly situation; if prd would not pass to 3 ( as s/he shld not do) that would be best. 4 would require 1 more card in . 2 is dangerous because its higher suit than and we could be moysian in 4 level and have 5-3 as a side suit. 2Nt with singleton Q is also unatractive bid, prd raises to 3 Nt 3532 hand.

Im not saying 2 is clearly a best bid, but lets hope prd wont pass it and turns out to have a 5 card suit. If s/he bids 3 Nt to 2 u can always bid 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gnasher and his teammates seem to have these problems well in hand... here is the "Scoltock Adjunct":

 

2 artificial, 2 asks, after which:

 

2 = 2 was a natural reverse

2NT= " with spade stopper

3 = 6-3 in and

3 = not sure; maybe natural reverse with more shape

3= hand too good to raise to 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I usually bid 1S as one round forcing here and 2S as C one suiter 6+C, 16+, 3C shows invitational value with strong clubs. I think that's the easiest treatment here.

[hv=pc=n&s=saj4hak2dqckq8743&d=s&v=0&b=11&a=1cp1hp]133|200[/hv]

 

What the bleep do I bid now?

 

A good partner I haven't played much with suggested a jump-shift to 2. I would assume that shows 4, but even so, is that maybe the least bad lie here?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I usually bid 1S as one round forcing here and 2S as C one suiter 6+C, 16+, 3C shows invitational value with strong clubs. I think that's the easiest treatment here.

 

Most partners I play use a j/s to show 4 card support of , so 2nt here is used as GF, catch all bid (denying 4, 4 & if 4 then not 5) partner bids 3c as an asks - with 1 partner 3 now shows 3316 and all other bids natural.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I usually bid 1S as one round forcing here....

We don't have xxhong's 2S jump convention, but we do have 1S as 99 percent forcing (1/1/1), and would do that with the given hand. We later jump in hearts if possible, which only shows three of them and implies long clubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...