Jump to content

extra's or preference?


1H 1S 2C 2N 3S  

17 members have voted

  1. 1. 3S shows...

    • extra's
    • preference
    • I have no agreement
    • other
      0


Recommended Posts

Responder has enough to invite, but not demand game; so, he could easily have five spades on this auction. 2D would have committed to game.

 

So, Opener shows enough values to accept game and is showing 3 spades enroute. The Pattern will be 3-5-1-4 (maybe 3-5-0-5). Too late for simply preference because:

 

Opener does not know, for sure, that responder does have 5 spades, so he cannot bypass 3NT and jump to 4S. The 3S bid has a range starting at about 13, but could be just below jump-shift.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:rolleyes:

Thanks, I think this is a key point here. Is the corollary to this that we must always raise with 3514?

With extra values, e.g. Qxx x AKJxx AJxx I would bid 2 over 1 then 2 if partner gives preference to 2. The hand is too good to just raise immediately to 2 but I would still like to stop low if partner is minimum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Thanks, I think this is a key point here. Is the corollary to this that we must always raise with a minimum hand (added) and 3514?

 

 

With extra values, e.g. Qxx x AKJxx AJxx I would bid 2 over 1 then 2 if partner gives preference to 2. The hand is too good to just raise immediately to 2 but I would still like to stop low if partner is minimum.

Agree.

 

I know some players have a method to determine if 2 was made on a 3 or 4 card raise. Is this important, if so what method do you use?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it showed a 'preference' to spades, i.e. 3 spades. Of course it implies that opener wants to go higher so it's an acceptance of the invitation of 2NT so it should be forcing.

 

after:

1x-1M

2M-2NT

 

asks opener how he supported, you can choose the set of responses you want, I usually play:

 

3 3-card support with a singleton

3 4-card support with a singleton

3 3 no sing

3 4 no sing

3NT 4333 with 4-card support

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are quite a few schemes around after 1m - 1M - 2M. First of all the simplest a la Acol is to simply play that 2NT is an invite with a 4 card suit which Opener can correct to 3M with a min and 4 card support. Similarly for 3NT. The most common scheme is 3434, that is that if Responder bids the next step (some play always 2NT instead) the bids are ordered 3 + min; 4 + min; 3 + extras; 4 + extras. There are also more complicated version too where Opener can show a shortage along the way. Hanoi's method is one variety of this but there are also others. There was also a thread (at least one) about this subject not so long ago which might be worth looking up.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does 3 so extra's or simply preference?

 

1:1

2:2N

 

The normal meanings of the bids here are:

 

3: Minimum 5 - 5 (doesn't want to play 2NT)

3: GF, patterning out

3: GF, as a minimum 6 - 4 hand would rebid 2

3: GF, patterning out

3NT: To play

 

Except 3, all bids are geared towards finding the best game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...