Hanoi5 Posted September 8, 2011 Report Share Posted September 8, 2011 Pa-1♣-1♦-2♣Pa-3♣ What do you play 3♣ as? What's better? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siegmund Posted September 8, 2011 Report Share Posted September 8, 2011 I like 2♣ to still be inverted after they overcall 1 of a suit, in which case 3♣ is still minimum-without-major-stoppers... but I realize that's going to be a minority viewpoint. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted September 8, 2011 Report Share Posted September 8, 2011 Pa-1♣-1♦-2♣Pa-3♣ What do you play 3♣ as? What's better?I prefer 3c here as a blocking bid, minimum. 2c by pard is weakish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted September 8, 2011 Report Share Posted September 8, 2011 Playing inverted minors in competition as horrible imo, I prefer 2♣ to be a simple raise. 3♣ in this sequence is rather preemptive, opener has many ways to try an invite otherwise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdeegan Posted September 8, 2011 Report Share Posted September 8, 2011 Playing inverted minors in competition as horrible imo, I prefer 2♣ to be a simple raise. 3♣ in this sequence is rather preemptive, opener has many ways to try an invite otherwise. :P My sentiments exactly. It's not a total bar bid. It shows a good playing hand with some club length and invites pard to go to 4♣ if LHO gets active again. Maybe:AxKxxxxAQJxxx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mich-b Posted September 8, 2011 Report Share Posted September 8, 2011 For me 3♣ is non invitational.If opener wants to invite he can bid 2M or 2NT. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted September 8, 2011 Report Share Posted September 8, 2011 2C is a simple weak raise, 3C inv. Something more elaborate may be better, the 1D overcall did not take away any bid,so you could keep your complete agreement set, but where do you draw the line?After a 1H / 1S overcall? And does the same apply, if we opened 1D / 1H, they overcall 1H / 1S? Will you be able to remember this? Sry, for me best is KISS as much as possible. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanoi5 Posted September 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 8, 2011 2♣ is 6-10. The thing is opener might want to invite to 3NT WITHOUT a diamond stopper. But I think 2♦ could help in that situation: it's forcing, partner can even show his range if he has the stopper, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yu18772 Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 Not invitational, with ♣ length for me 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted September 9, 2011 Report Share Posted September 9, 2011 Not defined in my pet system, but by meta-agreements I'd say pard would take this as 5 clubs, min hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerben42 Posted September 12, 2011 Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 2C is a simple weak raise, 3C inv. Something more elaborate may be better, the 1D overcall did not take away any bid,so you could keep your complete agreement set, but where do you draw the line?After a 1H / 1S overcall? And does the same apply, if we opened 1D / 1H, they overcall 1H / 1S? Will you be able to remember this? Sry, for me best is KISS as much as possible. With kind regardsMarlowe There is not much to remember. If another bid is possible, raising to three is not invitational. Here "another bid" is 2♦. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.