SimonFa Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Partner has asked just me about this hand from last night and knows I'm posting here.... Teams, W Vs R, better than average opps, I'm dealing 1C - (1H) - ? Partner had: ♠QJ♥AXXX♦KQJX♣XXX FWIW We play better minor and open on a count of 19 in at this vulnerability with a 5/4 or better distribution. For some reason partner doubled, which I alerted as showing 4-spades (our system but partner keeps forgetting). My view is too strong for 2NT and it would be nice to have 2 stops for 3NT. 2♦looks OK and a rebid of NT then describes her hand. On balance I think 3NT is probably best. Any thoughts? Thanks in advance, Simon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BunnyGo Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 I like a 2H bid. He wants you to play NT if that's where it ends up (especially if you have Qx). Double is clearly wrong. I don't like a NT bid, because it's clearly wrongsiding it no matter what you have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_dude Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Agree that NT on Axxx seems wrong .. but I don't like 2H on xxx of clubs either. We don't want to encourage play in clubs unless we hear more from partner. 2♦ seems a much better description of our values. Better question is, does our system have a way to get partner to bid NT on Qx or Jxx? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farrnbach Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 2nt (if it is 10-11) is out of questionMy preferences in descending order2h if it asks for a stop2d if it is forcing3nt otherwise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BunnyGo Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Better question is, does our system have a way to get partner to bid NT on Qx or Jxx? Often people play that cue-bidding their major is a stopper ask. Not always, but that's what a 2♥ bid may elicit (rather than it necessarily being a strong club suit raise). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mck4711 Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 I agree: Too strong for 2NT, and with only 1 stopper. With values for game I would cue-bid: 2♥. After 1m opening that does not necessarily show fit, but tells P that I am strong enough for game, but cant describe my hand as this moment in a better way. Especially I am asking for ♥-stopper. In case P doesnt bid NT, I can still ask with 3♥ for a half-stopper. Edited: "♥-stopper" instead of "♠-stopper" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 "FWIW We play better minor and open on a count of 19 in at this vulnerability with a 5/4 or better distributionedit" tough problem with a so so 13 I will try 2nt which is far from perfect. We are told pard can open on: Axxx...xx...xx....AQxxx so I dont think we are too strong, I am worried we are too weak. I will assume 1nt is around 8-11 or so after lite 1c openings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Hi, 3NT, wtp. You have Axxx, i.e. you have enough cards to cut of the communication in hearts,so the stopper is enough for 3NT.Sometimes p asks me, do I have a stopper, and I will bid 3NT with Ax or (heaven forbid) with Qxx, why should I worry holding Axxx?Sometimes a Jx showes up in p hand, and Axxx turns out to be ATxx or A9xx. 2D is certainly a reasonable option, but the question arises, what is your plan tobid next? If the answer is 3NT, the stopper did not improve. Keep it simple. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts