dcohio Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 [hv=pc=n&s=saqt5hk954dakt86c&d=e&v=n&b=2&a=p1d3cd5c]133|200[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 Dbl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 6♣ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyman Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 6♣ for me. My hand is so good, and partner's not joking around doubling 3C r/w. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VM1973 Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 I agree with the 6♣ bidders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 well 6♣ should be pick a slam and given that the negative X was over 3♣ partner should have the values for slam to be a good prospect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 LOL at me for totally agreeing with such a diverse four, above. We must all be wrong. Change the title; make it a 6-level decision for CHO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeh Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 Anyone who doesn't bid 6♣ should be condemned to holding 3=3=3=4 3 counts for the next 5 years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 Anyone who doesn't bid 6♣ should be condemned to holding 3=3=3=4 3 counts for the next 5 years. what he said Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcohio Posted August 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 good thing i bid 6♣! Partner put us in 6D with a 3451 hand stiff A♣, I think he feared a diamond lead being ruffed in 6♥ Unfortunately at MP, we barely got avg+ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyman Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 Unfortunately at MP, we barely got avg+ I take all the avg+'s I can get. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.