Jump to content

Second round cue by advancer


Recommended Posts

How do you play a second round cuebid by the partner of a 1NT overcaller? For example:

 

1. (1C)-1NT-(pass)-2C-(pass)-2D/2M-(pass)-3C

2. (1C)-1NT-(pass)-2D/2H-(pass)-2H/2S-(pass)-3C

 

Assume opponents are playing a standardish system, so 1C promises 3+. 1NT is standard, 15-18 or so, with systems on. Is there any difference if the opening bid was 1D, promising 4+ except in a hand specifically 4=4=3=2?

 

I can think of several possibilities: natural (especially over 1C), asking for stopper verification, secondary transfer, etc. What is best?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you play a second round cuebid by the partner of a 1NT overcaller? For example:

 

1. (1C)-1NT-(pass)-2C-(pass)-2D/2M-(pass)-3C

2. (1C)-1NT-(pass)-2D/2H-(pass)-2H/2S-(pass)-3C

 

Assume opponents are playing a standardish system, so 1C promises 3+. 1NT is standard, 15-18 or so, with systems on. Is there any difference if the opening bid was 1D, promising 4+ except in a hand specifically 4=4=3=2?

 

I can think of several possibilities: natural (especially over 1C), asking for stopper verification, secondary transfer, etc. What is best?

 

This is a good question. I can see value in natural and in shortness-showing, akin to your stopper verification (you'd only want to do that when you have a singleton/void I'd think).

 

I'd lean towards natural when they bid a minor and shortness when they show a major (or rather, 0/1/2/3/4+ card suit and 5+ card suit respectively). You rarely seem to need the shortness bid systemically since you'll either have a 6 card suit or be 5-4 and be able to introduce another suit (or, over 1N-2C;2D, be 4441).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's look at question # 2 ... the Transfer case.

 

gnasher has another Game Force toy [ http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/topic/45920-1n-2h2s-3d/ ( post # 16 ) 5/21/2011 ] where 3C!( by Responder ) = artificial, GF, 2-way "multi" .

 

Responder is showing 5M/4+m

 

Next by Opener:

3D! = 2 cards M, asks for the minor

3M! = 3 cards M

 

[ more about gnasher's method: quote name='gnasher' timestamp='1305964752' post='547972' ]

 

Zelandakh also offered some refinements to the above in reply ( # 29 ) 6/13/ 2011 .

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...