Phil Posted July 18, 2011 Report Share Posted July 18, 2011 All matchpoints. About 50-50 good and weak players in the field. 1. ♠Kx ♥T8xx ♦T7xx ♣K8x w/r pass - (pass) - 1♦ - (1♠);dbl - (1N) - pass - (2♠);? 2. ♠JT9xx ♥AJxx ♦xx ♣Ax r/w (pass) - 1♥ - (2♣) - 3♣'(pass) - 3♦ - (3♠) - 4♥;(4♠) - 6♦ - (pass) - ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G_R__E_G Posted July 18, 2011 Report Share Posted July 18, 2011 #1 seems like a clear pass to me. #2 is really interesting. I have a policy to not bid a grand at matchpoints unless it's a really strong field or unless I can clearly count 13 tricks. This hand might be one where I violate that policy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted July 18, 2011 Report Share Posted July 18, 2011 1) 3♦ 2) 6♥ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxhong Posted July 18, 2011 Report Share Posted July 18, 2011 I may start from 2D for the first hand. For the second one, 7H looks good, although I may bid 5D over 4S with - KQxxxx AKQxx xx, so 6D perhaps also indicates a second round C control, like - KQxxxx AKxxxx x or - KQxxxx AKQxx KxAll matchpoints. About 50-50 good and weak players in the field. 1. ♠Kx ♥T8xx ♦T7xx ♣K8x w/r pass - (pass) - 1♦ - (1♠);dbl - (1N) - pass - (2♠);? 2. ♠JT9xx ♥AJxx ♦xx ♣Ax r/w (pass) - 1♥ - (2♣) - 3♣'(pass) - 3♦ - (3♠) - 4♥;(4♠) - 6♦ - (pass) - ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
semeai Posted July 18, 2011 Report Share Posted July 18, 2011 3♦, 7♥ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nigel_k Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 1. I would definitely have raised to 2♦ the first time. Now I guess to bid 3♦ or whatever I do to show a weak hand with diamond support. 2. 6♥. Maybe grand makes but I'll take my average minus and get it back by making an overtrick in 1NT on the next hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 I will bid the pedestrian 3D and the pedestrian 6H. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Hi, #1 I am bidding 3D, although pass is certainly a reasonable alternative, maybe even the wiser.#2 6H, I have a nice hand, but I am certainly min. for my bidding, if I would be a passed hand, you could talk me into bidding 7H. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 1. would have passed first time, not enough to X, 2♦ would have been inverted, 3♦ now. 2. Very close, what is partner's shape and what is RHO's. If partner has say void, KQxxxx, AKxxx, Kx a 5-1 diamond break will still scupper you in 7 unless the hand with one diamond also has one heart. RHO appears to have 6+ clubs (LHO didn't raise) and presumably 4+ spades, but if he only has 4 spades, I'd guess he has a 7th club so he has somewhere to go if doubled. I think the chance of bad breaks outweighs the chance of partner holding ♦Q and possibly J (could pard have bid 5♠ voidwood with solid ♦ ?), so 6♥ for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhm Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 1.) 3♦. I consider pass terrible when white at any form of scoring. Yes LHO could have a singleton ♠ and tomorrow you may be overrun by a bus. I presume that 1♦ can not be opened with 3-3 in the minors, but this is a good example why 1♦ should guarantee 4 cards in general. 2.) 6♥. 7♥ too speculative. Rainer Herrmann 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted July 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Here's what happened: 1) I bid 3♦. Partner held AT8x, Qx, AQJxx, xx. 3♦ was -100, 2♠ should make, but wasn't by most of the field. 2) I wanted to bid 8 with this! Partner is bidding 6 and inviting 7 opposite a hand simply accepting a game try. Along with the opps bidding, partner chose not to bid RKC, so partner is marked with a spade void. I thought: void, KQxxxx, AKQxx, xx was a certainty. Nothing matters, and partner admits he lost his mind. However, so did the opponents, as partner's hand was x, QTxxx, AKQJxx, x. 7♥ was -200 with the heart finesse losing. 6♥ gets the same MPs. 4♠ is very expensive, but I can't see how we are going to defend that at these colors. RHO was 4=1=1=7. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 1. ♠Kx ♥T8xx ♦T7xx ♣K8x w/r pass - (pass) - 1♦ - (1♠);dbl - (1N) - pass - (2♠);? 3♦. Looks like a no-brainer. What am I missing? (Ok, 2NT if you're playing lebensohl here.) 2. ♠JT9xx ♥AJxx ♦xx ♣Ax r/w (pass) - 1♥ - (2♣) - 3♣'(pass) - 3♦ - (3♠) - 4♥;(4♠) - 6♦ - (pass) - ? Not had to see pard with something like AxKQxxxAKQxxx Without the spade ace he'd probably bid a mere 5♦ over 4♠, so I think there's a good case for jumping this to 7. Still, I would stick to 6 only because a) pard need not be so strong (he could have tried 5♠ over 4 with a monster like this) and b) diamonds/hearts may not break well. For instance, 4-2 diams and 3-1 hearts sort of jeapordize 7. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelandakh Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Did you misread auction two eagle? Can the opps really be saccing in 4S on a 6 card fit? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Yeah I missed something. As in, I forgot the shape I had :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.