dustinst22 Posted July 14, 2011 Report Share Posted July 14, 2011 http://tinyurl.com/5ublkms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 Who led a singleton? GIB is not on lead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloa513 Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 Who led a singleton? GIB is not on lead.You didn't look far enough. The aggrevious error is on trick 4, then a GIB is on lead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloa513 Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 Also pathetic bidding by North, it can make 4S, South just needs to lead up to the honours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtvesuvius Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 Also pathetic bidding by North, it can make 4S, South just needs to lead up to the honours.If you're going to be an resulter you should at least try to be accurate about it. 4♠ cannot make double dummy on any lead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dustinst22 Posted July 15, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 At my table:http://tinyurl.com/5ublkms At another:http://tinyurl.com/6b7a54u Maybe if I had led the K♣ instead? :) Oh wait, nm. http://tinyurl.com/6e7k7jx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
semeai Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 At my table:http://tinyurl.com/5ublkms At another:http://tinyurl.com/6b7a54u Maybe if I had led the K♣ instead? :) Oh wait, nm. http://tinyurl.com/6e7k7jx The difference I can spot is that you led the ♦9 for the ruff whereas both of the other tables led the ♦6. Why that matters to GiB, I do not know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dustinst22 Posted July 15, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 The difference I can spot is that you led the ♦9 for the ruff whereas both of the other tables led the ♦6. Why that matters to GiB, I do not know. Yes, I think you're right. Oh wait, someone else did the same :) http://tinyurl.com/62xgrf7 I'll just chock this one up to some glitch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
semeai Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 Yes, I think you're right. Oh wait, someone else did the same :) http://tinyurl.com/62xgrf7 I'll just chock this one up to some glitch. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 The difference I can spot is that you led the ♦9 for the ruff whereas both of the other tables led the ♦6. Why that matters to GiB, I do not know.Yeah that confirms what I thought, the systematic return is the 6, if you return the 9 gib deduces that you have started from aq9 so it doesn't need to ruff. Maybe it's a little weird to return the 9 instead of the q from aq9. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dustinst22 Posted July 15, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 Yeah that confirms what I thought, the systematic return is the 6, if you return the 9 gib deduces that you have started from aq9 so it doesn't need to ruff. Maybe it's a little weird to return the 9 instead of the q from aq9. See link above, I wasn't the only table that returned the 9. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloa513 Posted July 16, 2011 Report Share Posted July 16, 2011 Yeah that confirms what I thought, the systematic return is the 6, if you return the 9 gib deduces that you have started from aq9 so it doesn't need to ruff. Maybe it's a little weird to return the 9 instead of the q from aq9.Like GIB follows signals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bbradley62 Posted July 16, 2011 Report Share Posted July 16, 2011 Yeah that confirms what I thought, the systematic return is the 6, if you return the 9 gib deduces that you have started from aq9 so it doesn't need to ruff. Maybe it's a little weird to return the 9 instead of the q from aq9.So, NorthGIB deduces that EastGIB isn't smart enough to cover the 9 when he doesn't have the Q? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.