Jump to content

Biddink!


jschafer

Recommended Posts

Don't have enough information to answer your question.

 

Now, about the hand.

 

2 is right on values and shape, but I don't really want to emphasize a suit of 10xxxx. If partner has a minimum (or sub-minimum) opening, he may pass 2 on a small doubleton or, in a pinch, a singleton. Do you really want to play a seven-card fit at the two level on a 10 high fit?

 

1NT is a better response to 1. If partner passes 1NT (assuming that you do not play it 100% forcing by a passed hand) you are probably in the right spot.

 

Having said that, one is now faced with what to do over 3. I think that 4 is the percentage call. 3NT has two potential weak points - both minor suits. If partner's hearts do not run, you may not have 9 tricks without giving up the lead once or twice. Besides, it is very embarrassing to lose 4 or 5 tricks in a suit that you bid as a 2/1 response.

 

I don't like the idea of raising spades. Partner's spades could be forced with diamond leads.

 

So, I bid 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3S is clear IMO. Partner will be able to figure this out and decide which game his holding is suitable for.

 

How does partner know that you have the singleton J as opposed to a void in hearts? The J is a significant card.

 

Besides, as I already stated, the 4-3 is not likely to be right given that partner could be forced by diamond leads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a great hand - everything is working overtime here. I would like a doubleton heart of course.

 

3 could be misconstrued as looking for a 4-3, or possibly letting partner retreat to 3N.

 

4 is unambiguous and agrees hearts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have bid 1NT over 1H - although it's true that we are somewhat protected by our passed hand status I still wouldn't want to introduce a 10-high five card suit.

 

Assume you play some sort of drury (or a way of showing 3-card raise on the first round) I will now bid 4C a cue setting hearts which typically may show a singleton honour or a doubleton (some doubletons may be able to bid 3H over 2S). We have very good cards for partner although I am somewhat afraid partner may over/under value their diamond holding (maybe partner will like their Qx or maybe dislike a singleton).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

agree with artk78

 

after 1h u have to worry about potential misfit and

be a bit conservative. Save the 2d bids for hands with

at least halfway decent diamonds. The other BIG downside

of 2d is potentially losing a large club fit. It is

very unlikely you have a game if p cannot bid over 1n

(since i dont know system doing best i can).

 

If we assume the bidding proceeds in a simlar fashion

 

1h 1n

2s 2n

3h

 

Your hand is golden for suit contract and p knows you

have a maximum xx hearts yet still bid 3h. The heart J

is easily as good a xx and your KQ spades and side ace

are much more than p might expect go for game. 3S while

a decent bid on values leaves p with illusion you might

be void certainly at most 1 small heart and odds are

mighty thin p has 5 spades.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does partner know that you have the singleton J as opposed to a void in hearts? The J is a significant card.

 

Besides, as I already stated, the 4-3 is not likely to be right given that partner could be forced by diamond leads.

 

If I was void in hearts, I dont think id entertain the possibility of playing 3NT, and may just blast 4S. I wouldn't mind playing this hand in NT, spades, or hearts depending on partner's hand.

 

I can see the argument that this hand will work great if partner has solid hearts, but can't partner have

 

AJxx KQxxxx A Qx

 

I have a great hand for hearts I acknowledge that, but I may not want to be past 4H, which is what 4C almost surely guarentees.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was void in hearts, I dont think id entertain the possibility of playing 3NT, and may just blast 4S. I wouldn't mind playing this hand in NT, spades, or hearts depending on partner's hand.

 

I can see the argument that this hand will work great if partner has solid hearts, but can't partner have

 

AJxx KQxxxx A Qx

 

I have a great hand for hearts I acknowledge that, but I may not want to be past 4H, which is what 4C almost surely guarentees.

 

Where do you want to play if partner has the hand you suggest? 6? If your answer is 4, I suggest that 4 is just as good and may be better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was void in hearts, I dont think id entertain the possibility of playing 3NT, and may just blast 4S. I wouldn't mind playing this hand in NT, spades, or hearts depending on partner's hand.

 

I can see the argument that this hand will work great if partner has solid hearts, but can't partner have

 

AJxx KQxxxx A Qx

 

I have a great hand for hearts I acknowledge that, but I may not want to be past 4H, which is what 4C almost surely guarentees.

 

Considering its very difficult to construct a passed hand without a primary fit that makes a slam opposite this, I think advancing past 4 would be very bad.

 

Examples like this do underscore how good hearts play, and how lousy spades play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...