Jump to content

Recommended Posts

[hv=pc=n&w=sat852hat843dq87c&d=n&v=e&b=9&a=3c3np]133|200[/hv]

 

 

3N shows a fair hand with stoppers, could be a good 16+, or maybe a bit more.

 

It's likely to deny length in both majors, otherwise a double may have been fetched out of the bidding box as alternative bid.

 

 

Would 4 suggest?

 


  •  
  • 5-5 in majors?
  • 4-4 in majors?
  • or just general force?

 

 

Once you've defined 4 what do you fancy now? Pass or something else?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think 4 would show the Majors and a fairly good hand. I think we have both, especially because of the distribution. Partner should have at least a 3-card Major. The lead will also go up to him. I'd bid it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you have some complicated agreements with partner, 4C is the only general forcing bid you've got, so you can't use it to show both majors. 3NT could be anything from a 3334 17-count to a 2362 21-count and various things in between. I would still bid 4C, but it's going to be a complete guess for the rest of the auction. Sorry.
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think 4 would show the Majors and a fairly good hand. I think we have both, especially because of the distribution. Partner should have at least a 3-card Major. The lead will also go up to him. I'd bid it.

 

 

Partner hasn't promised a 3-card major. What would you bid over 3C looking at

 

Qx

K

AKJxxxx

Axx

 

?

 

I am happy to be in 6D opposite that hand... but just pointing out that you can't bid 4C as strict emphasis on the majors and be certain you will find a fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you have some complicated agreements with partner,

 

I have the rather uncomplicated agreement with my partner that we play Stayman and Jacoby Transfers over any 3NT overcall. Not sure whether that's good in general - on this hand it isn't maximally helpful, of course. I suppose I would bid Stayman and, if I get the expected 4 response, bid 4 and hope partner does something smart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't most people play systems on after NT overcalls? I would bid 3 to transfer to spades and then bid 4 for a choice of contracts. Sure, I might miss slam if partner has the perfect hand, or I might end up in a strange 5-2 fit if partner's no trump is strangely shaped.

 

In the absence of prior discussion, what's 4 - Stayman, Gerber, or some undefined big hand? I don't know.

 

I look forward to the personal attacks, flames, and downraves that are certain to follow this opinion.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't most people play systems on after NT overcalls? I would bid 3 to transfer to spades and then bid 4 for a choice of contracts. Sure, I might miss slam if partner has the perfect hand, or I might end up in a strange 5-2 fit if partner's no trump is strangely shaped.

 

In the absence of prior discussion, what's 4 - Stayman, Gerber, or some undefined big hand? I don't know.

 

I look forward to the personal attacks, flames, and downraves that are certain to follow this opinion.

 

 

We try and be polite in this forum, so I'll politely point out that partner has overcalled 3NT and 3H would be insufficient.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't most people play systems on after NT overcalls? I would bid 3 to transfer to spades and then bid 4 for a choice of contracts. Sure, I might miss slam if partner has the perfect hand, or I might end up in a strange 5-2 fit if partner's no trump is strangely shaped.

 

In the absence of prior discussion, what's 4 - Stayman, Gerber, or some undefined big hand? I don't know.

 

I look forward to the personal attacks, flames, and downraves that are certain to follow this opinion.

 

Most epic post ever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't most people play systems on after NT overcalls? I would bid 3 to transfer to spades and then bid 4 for a choice of contracts. Sure, I might miss slam if partner has the perfect hand, or I might end up in a strange 5-2 fit if partner's no trump is strangely shaped.

 

In the absence of prior discussion, what's 4 - Stayman, Gerber, or some undefined big hand? I don't know.

 

I look forward to the personal attacks, flames, and downraves that are certain to follow this opinion.

 

There's that 'downrave' word again.

 

I love the "here's my opinion, ......DUCK!!!!!!!!!"...attitude.

 

This seems to never come up, but I've seen agreements along the line of:

 

4 - "asking", see below

4 / 4 = transfers

4 - diamonds

 

After 4:

 

4 = min balanced (16-18ish)

4 = max balanced (19-21ish)

4 = min with a trick source

4N = max with a trick source

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...