jules101 Posted July 7, 2011 Report Share Posted July 7, 2011 [hv=pc=n&n=shak9dkq7654caj53&d=n&v=n&b=5&a=1d4spp]133|200[/hv] 1) is double from North for take out, or penalties? 2) what do you choose to bid when 4S is returned to you? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted July 7, 2011 Report Share Posted July 7, 2011 1) Obviously it depends on agreements, but imo it's best to play this as takeout. 2) Dbl. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted July 7, 2011 Report Share Posted July 7, 2011 Double. Reminds me of the Levin-Weinstein mishap, a must read imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanoi5 Posted July 7, 2011 Report Share Posted July 7, 2011 Double should be TO here. That's what I'd do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted July 7, 2011 Report Share Posted July 7, 2011 take out dbl bandwagon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted July 7, 2011 Report Share Posted July 7, 2011 Double is for takeout, and that's obviously a sensible option, but I think 4NT deserves consideration too. I rarely seem to get good results from doubling with a void in this sort of position - partner always leaves it in, and we usually get 300 against a making game. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelandakh Posted July 8, 2011 Report Share Posted July 8, 2011 I prefer to play double as values and 4NT for take-out over 4S but I recognise that this is a minority position. As Free suggests the correct call will depend on agreements. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VM1973 Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 Double. Reminds me of the Levin-Weinstein mishap, a must read imo.Where, then, can it be read? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveharty Posted July 9, 2011 Report Share Posted July 9, 2011 Where, then, can it be read?http://www.bridgewinners.com/index.php/under-further-review/535-under-further-review-i 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.