jillybean Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 I have always played Soloway style SJS and even after changing from SAYC to 2/1 I still play them, and like them.We use SJS M/m and S/H. I'm interested to know how others are playing it and if there is a better use. tyia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BunnyGo Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 (edited) I play reverse flannery for M/m. What it is: 1m-2H is 5+Sp and 4+ He and constructive values1m-2S is 5+Sp 4+He and limit raise1m-1S; blah-2H is now game forcing with 5+ Sp and 4+ He. I don't do anything fancy with 1H-2S. Just a weak jump shift. We do play: P-1H2S as an anonymous splinter. Maybe we should play it that way in all seats... Edit: Like Timo, I play support jump shift by passed hand for every jump except 1H-2S (and 1H-2NT is our spade jump shift). Edited June 28, 2011 by BunnyGo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted June 28, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 I play reverse flannery for M/m. What it is: 1m-2H is 5+Sp and 4+ He and constructive values1m-2S is 5+Sp 4+He and limit raise1m-1S; blah-2H is now game forcing with 5+ Sp and 4+ He. I don't do anything fancy with 1H-2S. Just a weak jump shift. We do play: P-1H2S as an anonymous splinter. Maybe we should play it that way in all seats... The F word! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BunnyGo Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 The F word! Why don't you like this convention? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 I have always played Solway style SJS and even after changing from SAYC to 2/1 I still play them, and like them.We use SJS M/m and S/H. I'm interested to know how others are playing it and if there is a better use. tyia By unpassed hand I play 9-11 6 cards invitational hands Kathryn. It not only comes frequent, but also helps when it doesnt come in other auctions knowing pd had the availibity to use it but didnt. As well as takes some weight on standart invitation bids. Not a fancy way i know but, easy to remember and easy to judge when used by any level of player. By passed hand i play it "support jump shift" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 I used to play Bergen raises and then I analysed the results I and others achieved with them in comparison to not using them. There was no advantage whatsoever. So we went back to strong jump shifts, not as strong as Soloway JS, but about a minimum of about 15+ with a very good 6 card suit, or alternatively a very good 5 card suit together with Hxx (+) support for partner's opened suit. This has made slam bidding and also game bidding far easier. I have a lot of time for intermediate js, particularly in the minors, (about 9-11 with a good 6 carder). I did play this for a while with a Polish partner who played it as part of Strefa. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgoetze Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 By unpassed hand I play 9-11 6 cards invitational hands Kathryn. It not only comes frequent, but also helps when it doesnt come in other auctions knowing pd had the availibity to use it but didnt. Especially when playing 2/1, you get these hands out of 1NT, which you can then play as semiforcing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 The F word!It's "reverse F", so that doesn't count :P I also like reverse flannery, although I play the weak version only:1m-2♥ = 5-9HCP, 5+♠, 4+♥1m-2♠ = 5+-9HCP, 5+m (1m-3m is 0-5 with support) This way opener can find out about min/max and shortness in responder's hand,... with a 2NT relay. It's more useful than the INV 5+♠ 4+♥ imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BunnyGo Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 It's "reverse F", so that doesn't count :P I also like reverse flannery, although I play the weak version only:1m-2♥ = 5-9HCP, 5+♠, 4+♥1m-2♠ = 5+-9HCP, 5+m (1m-3m is 0-5 with support) This way opener can find out about min/max and shortness in responder's hand,... with a 2NT relay. It's more useful than the INV 5+♠ 4+♥ imo. interesting treatment. What do you do with INV? bid 1S and then some NMF (or NMF-like) bid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 interesting treatment. What do you do with INV? bid 1S and then some NMF (or NMF-like) bid?We start with 1♠. Usually partner rebids 1NT after which we play XYZ (and have 2 ways of inviting: good INV via 2♣ or bad INV immediately). Partner supports on a 3 card ♠ regularly, after which we can still find the 4-4 ♥ fit. And if opener rebids his minor, the 2♥ rebid as INV+ and forcing for 1 round. Works ok. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 (edit: almost) Completely agree with BunnyGo! Reverse Flannery is a very good convention opposite 1m! BTW jillybean, fred is one of the most outspoken supporters of it. edit: sorry but I don't like 1♥-2♠ WJS and I really don't like anonymous splinter :( 1♥-2♠ as IJS is better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted June 28, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 Why don't you like this convention? Sorry. It's not the convention it's the F word that has such a bad rep, especially on forums. We will look at this. By unpassed hand I play 9-11 6 cards invitational hands Kathryn. It not only comes frequent, but also helps when it doesnt come in other auctions knowing pd had the availibity to use it but didnt. As well as takes some weight on standart invitation bids. Not a fancy way i know but, easy to remember and easy to judge when used by any level of player. By passed hand i play it "support jump shift" Thanks, I like the sounds of this and having these hands out of the 1N response. I used to play Bergen raises and then I analysed the results I and others achieved with them in comparison to not using them. There was no advantage whatsoever. So we went back to strong jump shifts, not as strong as Soloway JS, but about a minimum of about 15+ with a very good 6 card suit, or alternatively a very good 5 card suit together with Hxx (+) support for partner's opened suit. This has made slam bidding and also game bidding far easier. I have a lot of time for intermediate js, particularly in the minors, (about 9-11 with a good 6 carder). I did play this for a while with a Polish partner who played it as part of Strefa.We still play Bergen since we can use 2m/1M to force game, our SJS is only M/m and S/H. What do you use instead, a natural 1M:3M ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 Reverse Flannery does not have a bad reputation on the forums. I thought mike777 was the only regular forum poster that still played Bergen raises. I play invitational jump shifts. I like the idea of playing 1H - 2S as 5-9 so that 1H - 1S - 2red-2S can be used as an artificial GF, but I have never played this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 Ya I play full bergen. Also:1m=2h=reverse flannery.1m=2s=invitational in minor(crisscross)1m=jump in other minor gf(crisscross)1h=2s=stiff somewhere;2nt asks;about a 7 loser hand;1h=3s=void somewhere;3nt asks, etc.1s=3h=stiff or void somewhere;3s asks;etc.---- that throws a lot of the invitational hands into sf 1nt that others use as inv j/s. So far this is seldom an issue at the table and of course if pard is a passed hand then 1M=2minor does not become an issue. Also if LHO overcalls then 2/1 with an invite hand becomes less of an issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 Always invitational at the 3 level. Reverse Flannery and invitational JS's at the 2 level both have their wins, but since the Reverse Flannery is an 'impossible hand' to show sometimes, that's my preference. I scratch my head at people that like SJS over majors playing 2/1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted June 28, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 I scratch my head at people that like SJS playing over majors playing 2/1.We only play 1♥:2♠ as a SJS, I like being able to show this hand with one bid.Having said that, it's not needed now that we play xyz, I think the only auction that causes trouble is 1♥:1♠ 2♥. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelandakh Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 Over 1M I prefer all jump shifts to show support (good hands can relay or 2/1 depending on system). Over 1D (and 1C if natural) I prefer weak jump shifts. For me, even if SJS are seen as a necessity (why, especially playing 2/1 or relays, is a mystery), devoting 3 bids to them is a luxury. It seems a no-brainer to use the lowest jump shift as a general strong jump shift (which can be resolved) and use the other 2 for something else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BunnyGo Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 (edit: almost) Completely agree with BunnyGo! Reverse Flannery is a very good convention opposite 1m! BTW jillybean, fred is one of the most outspoken supporters of it. edit: sorry but I don't like 1♥-2♠ WJS and I really don't like anonymous splinter :( 1♥-2♠ as IJS is better. Yes, my new partner is having me play 2S as invitational. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 Sorry. It's not the convention it's the F word that has such a bad rep, especially on forums. We will look at this. Thanks, I like the sounds of this and having these hands out of the 1N response. We still play Bergen since we can use 2m/1M to force game, our SJS is only M/m and S/H. What do you use instead, a natural 1M:3M ? 1M 2NT = invit+Don't really know of many people who play Bergen these days, and even fewer who really know it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted June 28, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 1M 2NT = invit+Don't really know of many people who play Bergen these days, and even fewer who really know it.Funny, most players at the club here play Bergen but now that I think about it, maybe not the really good players. How does 1M 2N invit+ work. Is 1M:2N 3x:3M inviational? I've just discovered my partner plays Reverse Flannery with some of his other partners, so we could play.. RF or IJS (unpassed hand) and Fit jump (passed hand) and 1M:2C* clubs, balanced gf, or 4M gf and1M:2N inv+ Is that correct? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted June 28, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 The F word! It's "reverse F", so that doesn't count :P I think it would be better called Yrennalf. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flameous Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 In natural set up, I play weak jumps, but quite wide ranging comparing to most. Something like 3-8. This means that my rebid of a suit is good 8-11 and I still have bids for 12-13 point invites that might want to play there if partner holds stiff or something.Over 1♣ I've also played 2♦ multi and 2♥/♠ as reverse flannery. Over our unbal 1♦ opening we have 2♣ as multibid that may include wjs in either major, constructive diamond support or hand that can play 3♣ but is weak. 2♥ is 8-11 with both majors either way at least 54. Sort of less defined reverse flannery bid. 2♠ for us shows 5♥+4+♣. But these are very specifically designed for our system so I doubt you do much with them. 3lvl bids I have always conventional, so no any jumpshifts there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 Funny, most players at the club here play Bergen but now that I think about it, maybe not the really good players. How does 1M 2N invit+ work. Is 1M:2N 3x:3M inviational? I've just discovered my partner plays Reverse Flannery with some of his other partners, so we could play.. RF or IJS (unpassed hand) and Fit jump (passed hand) and 1M:2C* clubs, balanced gf, or 4M gf and1M:2N inv+ Is that correct? Do they know the continuations to Bergen, Kathryn? I bet they don't.1M 2NT3M = s/off against a min3? = long suit trial now 4M = accept, 3M = I had a limit raise and am not enamoured by your trial suit.Other bids by responder show different gf hands eg 3N = 16/17 raise, bid at the 4 level in a new suit = 14-16 splinter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted June 29, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 29, 2011 Do they know the continuations to Bergen, Kathryn? I bet they don't.1M 2NT3M = s/off against a min3? = long suit trial now 4M = accept, 3M = I had a limit raise and am not enamoured by your trial suit.Other bids by responder show different gf hands eg 3N = 16/17 raise, bid at the 4 level in a new suit = 14-16 splinter.Hi, Ron. Sorry, we play reverse Bergen so responder is telling not asking. I don't know how much better this is than std Bergen. Where can I find the full follow ups to Inv+ J2N? I've found this so far.. http://www.kolumbus.fi/memmu1/piv/bridge/fem.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted June 29, 2011 Report Share Posted June 29, 2011 Do they know the continuations to Bergen, Kathryn? I bet they don't.1M 2NT3M = s/off against a min3? = long suit trial now 4M = accept, 3M = I had a limit raise and am not enamoured by your trial suit.Other bids by responder show different gf hands eg 3N = 16/17 raise, bid at the 4 level in a new suit = 14-16 splinter. HOg makes an excellent point even if his facts are off a bit. His main point know bergen in full...etc....excellent pt btw I dont play his version if it exists of bergen... It iss hard to defend bergen if we cannot even agree what it is. ----------------------------\ in any point the huge point of bergen is LOTT. If you think LOTT is junk science then no reason to play bergen-------------- otoh if you think bergen really helps you on comp hands...ok...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.