Jump to content

Imps decision


rduran1216

Recommended Posts

The East hand does not have anything extra for a 2S advance to a direct-seat double.

 

IMO, it is subminimum for a 2S advance to partner's balancing seat double. (The xx by opener should not affect things in the same way that an xx by responder would have after a direct double.)

 

Pass would be a good idea now, for East.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4. Values for doubler's partner should not change when doubler is in the pass-out position. Partner knows this, and he was also aware of the redouble, so hopefully he won't have wasted values in clubs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=pc=n&e=sk983hq9dkj82cj53&d=n&v=n&b=5&a=1cppdr]133|200|

'rduran1216 asked....

If you decide to bid 2S partner will raise to 3, North will pass, and now what?

 

IMO...

Over the redouble, 1 = 10, 2 = 9, Pass = 0. I think Pass should be penalty :(

Over partner's raise to 3, Pass =10, 4 = 8, 2 = 4 :) .[/hv]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 is not a pretty bid. I like 1 originally and now I think it's high time to pass.

 

We have an aceless ugly duckling over here. Game takes a lot from partner. This is the sort of hand where it makes sense to pass partner's single raise even if he opened 1 and we replied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There appears to be some disagreemnet with calls after the XX in the OP text. I.e. after (1) P (P) X; (XX) what do the following calls mean pass, 1, 1, 1, 1NT, 2,2, 2, 2, 2NT,3,3, 3, 3, 3NT

 

Here some possiblities for discussion; hopefully they will be at least good targets for the skeeters out there :)

 

call; meaning

pass; to play - this means the responder is playing "must save"

1; less than a constructive raise

1; less than a constructive raise

1; less than a constructive raise

1NT; feel that this should stronger than a norm 1NT as you could save with 1x

2; not sure beyond forcing

2; constructive raise

2; constructive raise

2; constructive raise

2NT; min opening hand not wanting to punish partner

3; stopper ask for 3NT

3; limit raise

3; limit raise

3; limit raise

3NT; prefers not to play 1CXX

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, values do change after a balancing double. If after a direct double:

 

any new suit at the lowest level: 0-8

jump in any new suit: 9-11

cue bid: 12+

 

How does it change after a balancing double?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, values do change after a balancing double. If after a direct double:

 

any new suit at the lowest level: 0-8

jump in any new suit: 9-11

cue bid: 12+

 

How does it change after a balancing double?

 

You add a queen, e.g.

 

any new suit at the lowest level: 0-10

jump in any new suit: 11-13

cue bid: 14+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You add a queen

...

 

It depends where in the world you are! In Britain you act as if a king less, in Germany it is ~4hcp less if my translation of Forum D articles is correct. In general (very roughly) the more you are playing power doubles the lesser the differential; the more shape doubles then the larger the differential. Of course the boundary for a jump response also varies a little bit by region so you need to take that into account too...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, values do change after a balancing double. If after a direct double:

 

any new suit at the lowest level: 0-8

jump in any new suit: 9-11

cue bid: 12+

 

How does it change after a balancing double?

 

Even after a direct seat double I wouldn't jump to 2S with that many 9-counts on balanced hands with only 4 spades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

humongous ranges are unplayable. noone opens 1n meaning anywhere

from 12 to 21 so why play a response that has a range from 0-10?

 

We would bid 1s over the xx with say xxxx xxx xxx xxx and our hand is

around 3-4 tricks better than that so both hands cannot be bid the same

way.

 

IMO a 2s=10 2d=6 1s=2 at least 1s is better than bids like 7n

 

 

the general standard is assume p has around 7 points and one generally

subtracts 7 points from hand and bids from there with 0-7 being minimum

and above that extras. Here we have a decent 9 count and a 2s bid

seems appropriate and if it werent for the overall loathing of minors

a 2d bid would be even more accurate. Once p bids 3s we have hit gold

and our 9 count (ignoring club J) and ruffing value in hearts puts us

over the top and we would bid

 

4s and I would not be averse to seeing a 4d bid warning p that we have

only four spades and offering up a non forcing choice:) do not bid

4d unless you have discussed this stuff with partner.

 

after p bids 3s 4s = 10 pass = 6

 

remember that after this auction the play will practically be double dummy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...