pooltuna Posted June 16, 2011 Report Share Posted June 16, 2011 I prefer 3♠ to show a constructive raise so with a limit raise I have to push to game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil_20686 Posted June 16, 2011 Report Share Posted June 16, 2011 I have experimented with using dble here as a "good" 3!s bid. That has worked surprisingly well, although sometimes you miss having a bid to show both minors. However, I have found that to be quite a rare sequence in practice, and not without danger if you are wandering into a misfit in a minor at the 4 level. Would not like to comment on which one is more "optimal". I think thinking about bidding game here way over values your hand. Three small spades and doubleton heart are both the worst possible holdings. Partner should be aggressive in response when he has 5431 hands or a 6th spade, but conservative with a balanced hand. I do not think the hand given is as good as Kxxx x ATxxx xxx, in this position. And if you think 3!s is right with this hand you should not be considering anything else with the posted hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted June 16, 2011 Report Share Posted June 16, 2011 I don't think that 3♠ is right with Kxxx x A10xxx xxx. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted June 17, 2011 Report Share Posted June 17, 2011 I don't think that 3♠ is right with Kxxx x A10xxx xxx. Maybe because it is a limit raise :) 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pooltuna Posted June 17, 2011 Report Share Posted June 17, 2011 I would bid 3S. With JTx xx I would bid 4S. 3S is usually bid on a constructive raise to bad limit raise (less than a constructive raise passes). 4H is as gwnn described. WHAT!! YET ANOTHER LURPOA UPVOTE!! (a negative of a negative....etc_ :) 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted June 17, 2011 Report Share Posted June 17, 2011 Maybe because it is a limit raise :) I think Andy is upto shape of the hand and ability or pottential to produce tricks rather than giving pd some limit range such as "a good raise" "limit raise". At least thats what i thought he meant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted June 17, 2011 Report Share Posted June 17, 2011 Yes, I meant that the 4135 hand is a 4♠ bid, regardless of what you call it. With four-card support and a singleton heart, I'd nearly always bid game. In deciding whether to bid 3♠ or 4♠, you have to take into account what the opponents might do or what they might make. If you bid 3♠ on a 3244 11-count and the next hand bids 4♥, you can double and expect them to go down. If you bid 3♠ on a 4135 shape and the next hand bids 4♥, you're going to bid 4♠ anyway. There's a good chance that this will happen, so it's better to bid 4♠ immediately and make life harder for the opponents. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted June 17, 2011 Report Share Posted June 17, 2011 Another way to look at it: if you bid only 3♠, you're catering for the possibility that neither side can make ten tricks. With the 3244 11-count that's reasonably likely, but with the prime 4153 7-count it's not. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.