Jump to content

Dealer opens 4D vulnerable - your bid


Recommended Posts

4. Or 4NT. Looking forward to more educated bids, I need support and spade control for a slam (in fact 3 small spades in partner's hand, even Kxxx, means possible 3 losers in the suit) so I think 4NT might be a bit too much. But maybe that's just pessimistic.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we assume that the opening bidder has 8 to justify his bed and you have 0 that means the opponents should have a 10-card fit (I assume that responder would have raised if he'd had 3+) so assuming partner has an uninspiring 4-3-3-3 you should still bid because there will be 18 trumps on the deal. If 18 trumps = 18 tricks, then you can assume that if responder will go down 2 (+500) you're still better in 4 (+620).

 

As to WHAT exactly you should bid, I think that depends on your partnership agreements. Some people play doubles at that high level are penalty, while others play it's takeout. If 4NT means 2 lower unbid, then that could work too, but some people might think it's Blackwood. Holding 4 Quick Tricks I'd say pass is out.

  • Downvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 for me. Pre-empts work.

 

If pard is looking at a few and the cards I need for slam, she might be able to move, maybe not.

 

More importantly, if pard bids 4 I'll know they mean it and I can move. If I start with Dbl and pard bids 4 I have no idea if we are in a good spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4, passing when we have at least 9 maybe 10 tricks in our own hand is insane. Bidding 4N or double could work out, but they will leave us with much worse guesses on the next round -- If we bid 4N, and hear 5 or 5, we still won't know whether to raise (Although it will in theory be rightsided). If we double, and hear 4 from partner, what now? If we double and partner passes we aren't very happy either, since all our HCP and tricks will have to come from our long suits, which LHO rates to be short in. Even if partner bids 4 over the double, we still might not have 5 level safety, although I think 5 is definitely warranted then.

 

In any case, this is an interesting problem, and pre-empts do work sometimes... Especially 4m ones, which I find very rarely backfire, and often win a lot of IMPs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd double because it's the most flexible action. If partner passes we don't necessarily hate it, and it's possible that spades is the right strain. No matter what we do, we won't be in a good spot to judge what to do next, so I'll let partner in on the decision.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4, we might miss a better fit, but sometimes preempts work. Dbl is definitely an alternative, but I don't want partner to bid 4 with 4-3. 4 will usually be playable even if he has 5-2.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=pc=n&s=st86hakq73dcakq62&d=w&v=b&b=4&a=4dpp]133|200|

IMO_X (take-out) = 10, 4 = 9, 4N = 7.

You aim for the best result possible, rather than the best possible result.

Double is flexible - With equal length in the majors, you hope partner will bid 4

4 on a 4-3 fit is not necessarily any worse than 4 on a 5-1 or 5-2 fit because. with trumps, partner will be ruffing in the short hand.

4N may improve the chance of playing in the right strain but increases the level.

Sometimes partner will pass the double and that may even be the correct decision.[/hv]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 is clear (to me anyway). 4N is natural for me over a 4m preempt, so that is not an option. Even if it were is everyone really comfortable that 4N-->5 shows this kind of hand?

 

I don't understand double unless I were planning on taking another call over 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, that was in the original post. As I said, pass is out, by which I mean that passing is not a viable option.

 

It appears as though 4 people didn't like the post. I don't know why.

 

It looks like at least one read the post as 'pass it out' rather than 'pass is out'.

 

Also it may be that talking about things depending on partnership agreements attracted disapproval.

 

You may have committed other crimes I don't know about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like at least one read the post as 'pass it out' rather than 'pass is out'.

 

Also it may be that talking about things depending on partnership agreements attracted disapproval.

 

You may have committed other crimes I don't know about.

Well for me, double is out (of the question) because most partners I've had play double as penalty from 3NT on up and the hand may be many things, but a penalty double of 4 it is not. A lot of bids could work out. Partner might have Axxxx xx xxx xxxx and 4 or 5 might play very well with 4 an inferior place. On the other hand, considering the preempt, a very reasonable 4, 4 or 5 contract might run into 4-1 or 5-0 breaks. If I had the 4NT = 2 lower unbid agreement, that would be my preferred call. Otherwise you just take one of the suits and bid something in it. There aren't many ways to show a great two-suiter with one bid starting at the 4 level. The problem with a straight shot bid of 4 is your partner might well have AKJx x xxxx xxxx and you get a 4-2, 5-1 or even 6-0 break to top it off. 4NT might get you too high, but at least you land in a sensible contract.

 

Plus, if it's matchpoints, you have to face the possibility that other tables opened only 3 and so your hand got to bid both suits.

 

Even a 4NT Blackwood might work out well if partner responded that he held 2 aces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah well - no consensus it seems.......

 

[hv=pc=n&s=st86hakq73dcakq62&w=sq9h95dakj75432ct&n=sakj32h642d96cj97&e=s754hjt8dqt8c8543&d=w&v=b&b=4&a=4dpp4hppp]399|300[/hv]

 

 

You make 13 tricks in , , on any lead.

 

You are faced with fab dummy, but still expecting the suit to break badly, but all goes a bit too well.

 

If East and North hand were switched tho, then you would be congratulating yourself for perfect bid of 4.

 

All but one West elected to open 4, and this was a winning action. Only one in MP tourney reached slam after 4 was passed round to South. Most settled for 4+3, but a few collected +800 for 5X-3 after East raised!

 

One West opened 1 North found a overcall, and South drove to 6.

 

As Adam said, "preempts - especially those at 4-level - sometimes work....."

 

So another lesson from this hand is that opening 1 with West hand isn't a winning action? DISCUSS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The west hand is a crapshoot and a 1 opener could easily win. If you trade the North and East hands, this could lead to buying the contract or defending something below a cold N/S game.

 

The 4 bid on a different lie could easily be - whatever, doubled or not against nothing.

 

I might bid either depending on whether I had an extra shot in my latte but it's either or. A 3 level pre-empt is nowhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah well - no consensus it seems.......

 

[hv=pc=n&s=st86hakq73dcakq62&w=sq9h95dakj75432ct&n=sakj32h642d96cj97&e=s754hjt8dqt8c8543&d=w&v=b&b=4&a=4dpp4hppp]399|300[/hv]

 

 

You make 13 tricks in , , on any lead.

 

You are faced with fab dummy, but still expecting the suit to break badly, but all goes a bit too well.

 

If East and North hand were switched tho, then you would be congratulating yourself for perfect bid of 4.

 

All but one West elected to open 4, and this was a winning action. Only one in MP tourney reached slam after 4 was passed round to South. Most settled for 4+3, but a few collected +800 for 5X-3 after East raised!

 

One West opened 1 North found a overcall, and South drove to 6.

 

As Adam said, "preempts - especially those at 4-level - sometimes work....."

 

So another lesson from this hand is that opening 1 with West hand isn't a winning action? DISCUSS!

I must admit that it never entered my mind to find 3 in the responder hand because you should raise with that holding. You could easily buy the contract for 5 undoubled or push 4th seat into making a high-level guess without much to go on. It is just barely possible to find slam, I think maybe with

4 PASS PASS 4NT (two lower unbid)

PASS 5 PASS 6... but really it's kind of a stretch.

 

And making 13 tricks with the hands is kind of lucky. Not only do you need hearts to behave, but you also need to find the Q in the pocket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...