Jump to content

responses to mini/weak nt


luke warm

Recommended Posts

I just want an unknown hand to declare, and I want a known hand to be dummy.

I don't even think that should be top priority for placing the hand!

 

Playing with a fairly normal weak NT, I can bid 4M directly if I have a bunch of kings and queens to protect them, and transfer and then bid 4M if I have mostly aces to protect my partner's kings and queens. That, to me, is far more important than known vs. unknown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are more important goals than placing declarer.

This is quite far from the truth... But if you don't care, so be it, I just want an unknown hand to declare, and I want a known hand to be dummy. Makes it lots harder for defenders!

I never said that I didn't care. I just reckon that it is a lower priority than other factors, such as finding the right contract. Players who concentrate on placing declarer do so, in my judgement, because they do not appreciate the potential for using the bidding space for accurate bidding, which potential is stifled by their focusing on this obsession.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i obviously agree with jack here, since i can play the relays either way... where he and i disagree are on the unbalanced hands where relays might not be the best way to find the fit/level

 

i don't think there is a clear superiority of one method vs. the other, i just think relays come out ahead *most* of the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...