Syl20 Posted September 17, 2004 Report Share Posted September 17, 2004 Hi,For the ZAR users.This evaluation seems interesting but i still have uncertainties...Thanks to convice me on the following point: when responder as a fit and Ace of trumps, this Ace counts 8 Zars : 4Hcp + 2Cont. + 2Hon. in trumps suit ?Seems a lot, no ?How many Zars do you count on:♠KQJxx♥AQx♦Ax♣xxxopposite:♠Axx♥xxx♦Qxxxx♣xx On Zar's site. It is claimed that 99% of the games made on a championship were found with Zar evaluation.This looks impressive but what would better suit me is the ratio:"number of game bid with ZAR and not by conventional evaluation AND made" to"number of game bid with ZAR and not by conventional evaluation AND off". Any comments welcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted September 17, 2004 Report Share Posted September 17, 2004 I'm not a zar user, so I won't respond to this first question. However, I've seen many good evaluation statistics but indeed, never one where zar fails and the field scores. I've also noticed that many slams bid by zar are on a finesse! So I'm still not that impressed to switch over... I'm also interested in these 'negative' stats, if they exist :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skorchev Posted September 17, 2004 Report Share Posted September 17, 2004 On Zar's site. What is Zar's site? Stefan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted September 17, 2004 Report Share Posted September 17, 2004 On Zar's site. What is Zar's site? Stefan Click here for Zar's site Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted September 17, 2004 Report Share Posted September 17, 2004 Hi,For the ZAR users.This evaluation seems interesting but i still have uncertainties...Thanks to convice me on the following point: when responder as a fit and Ace of trumps, this Ace counts 8 Zars : 4Hcp + 2Cont. + 2Hon. in trumps suit ?Seems a lot, no ?How many Zars do you count on:♠KQJxx♥AQx♦Ax♣xxxopposite:♠Axx♥xxx♦Qxxxx♣xx On Zar's site. It is claimed that 99% of the games made on a championship were found with Zar evaluation.This looks impressive but what would better suit me is the ratio:"number of game bid with ZAR and not by conventional evaluation AND made" to"number of game bid with ZAR and not by conventional evaluation AND off". Any comments welcome.The ACE in your partner's suit counts as 7 points, not 8. You get 4 for high card value, 2 for control, but only one for fitting honor in partner suit. The north hand you show has:11 distributional zar ponts, 16 hcp, 5 control points = 32 Zar points The South hand you show has:11 distributional, 6 hcp, 2 for control for 19 Zar points. When north shows spades, south gets to add one pont for the fitting heart honor. This totals 52 (32+19+1 fit). In theory, with fit enough for game. Not all 52 Zar point hands will make game, and you will not be able to tell with certainty if you have 52 during bidding anyway. Additional comments. Bidding ZAR points is aggressive. You will bid a lot more slams and games, and as a result you will go down in games more often (but you will make a lot more too). One way to keep from overbidding is to use negative zar points as well. Take off for horrible distribution, take off points for shortness in trumps. I find Zar ponts quite effective if used with COMMON sense too. Thsi forum has a lot of theads on zar points and other evaluation schemes. You may want to read the following threads (ZAR himself particpates here). Below is only a partial listing of some useful thread on ZAR points Zar points, useful or waste of energy, New to the concept, does it help... Fine tuning ZAR points., Help me with my adjustments... Zar evaluation and 2004 Cavendish, Invitational Pairs Zar points application in competitive bidding ZAR Distribution Points, An easier way to calculate Zar points and hands with no defensive strength, Problems if opps compete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syl20 Posted September 22, 2004 Author Report Share Posted September 22, 2004 The ACE in your partner's suit counts as 7 points, not 8. You get 4 for high card value, 2 for control, but only one for fitting honor in partner suit. Additional comments. Bidding ZAR points is aggressive. You will bid a lot more slams and games, and as a result you will go down in games more often (but you will make a lot more too). One way to keep from overbidding is to use negative zar points as well. Take off for horrible distribution, take off points for shortness in trumps. I find Zar ponts quite effective if used with COMMON sense too.Thanks for the answer. I made a tool to calculate Zar points (thanks Free for the advice :D ) with positive corrections for trump honnours, trump length if doubletons and singletons and negative corrections in case of singleton or doubleton Queen and Jacks and singleton Kings.I asked "bridgelab.exe" to make 18000 boards with an opening 1♠ (5+♠, 12-17Hcp) and a fit for responder (5+Hcp, 3+♠).Then, i calculated the number of tricks in ♠ for every board (with "gib.exe") and classified the number of tricks for various combined Zar points.Although, i neither consider any opponents bidding (for other corrections) nor double fits, i found that the average tricks for 52 Zars is 9.0x and you need 56 Zars to get 10 tricks on average. I assume that we wish at least a probability of 50% to make the contract to be happy with the estimator.Any comments ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted September 22, 2004 Report Share Posted September 22, 2004 Then, i calculated the number of tricks in ♠ for every board (with "gib.exe") and classified the number of tricks for various combined Zar points.I found that the average tricks for 52 Zars is 9.0x and you need 56 Zars to get 10 tricks on average. I assume that we wish at least a probability of 50% to make the contract to be happy with the estimator.Any comments ? Well, I believe your approach is sound way to go. However, I wonder if your corrections and counting was accurate. People make a lot of mistakes in trying to interpret zar points. For instance, for the longest time, I counted 1 point for each honor in "our suit" was a fit was found from both sides of the table.. Thus, with KQxx opposite AJxx I would count 10 hcp, 3 controls, and 4 point for "fitting honors" for a total of 17 ZAR POINTS. This is not correct. Whoever bids this suit first, can not count the two extra points for fitting honors. So this is only 15 Zar fit points. There are other gotcha's as well. Some have tripped me up, some have tripped up others. A big one is people count way to much for shortness once a fit is found... New users often fail to grasp when you can, and when you can not count the short suit points. So if you are going to make the claim that you need 56 zar points for game, it is imporant that you have caluculated the points correctly. ght. So, could you either show 10 pair of hands and tell us what you think the zar count is, or better yet, explain in detail your algorith for calculating 1) Initial Zar points (I am sure you got this part right)2) Fit Zar points 3) Negative Zar points. My own research suggest the 9.0 tricks for 52 zar points is too low. It is less than 10, but not nearly that much, which suggest that you are probably calculating the points wrong (or I am). Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcLight Posted September 22, 2004 Report Share Posted September 22, 2004 What is bridgelab.exe? I looked for it on the web and couldn't find it.I would find it useful if there was some software I could use to generate lots of hands and save them as text files so I could write a program to analyze them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted September 22, 2004 Report Share Posted September 22, 2004 What is bridgelab.exe? I looked for it on the web and couldn't find it.I would find it useful if there was some software I could use to generate lots of hands and save them as text files so I could write a program to analyze them. I think it would be much, much harder to write a program to analyze dealt hands than to write one to generate random or constrained hands (spoken by someone who doesn't program anything more complicated that a VCR). To find bridgelab.exe on the web, just look up "Bridge Lab". They take the space out of the name because it is dos0based program. Here is one link http://www.trsteiner.de/bridge/en/tools.shtml But if you want to set up hand constraints and deal them out, and then analyze what can and can't be made, I suggest Dealmaster pro. See this webpage http://www.dealmaster.com/ Deal master is a little expensive given the other free tools, and mulit-function tools. But on the other hand, it does what you want it to do. Be sure to look at the hand record (your generated hands) with "makable contracts".. I think this is what you might be looking for in one program, here is a linik to that feature as it is kind of hard to find on the pages http://www.dealmaster.com/prthr1.htm Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcLight Posted September 23, 2004 Report Share Posted September 23, 2004 Ben, thanks for the links. I just played around with BridgeLab.exe. Its good for waht it does, and the other software on that page seems good as well. > I think it would be much, much harder to write a program to analyze dealt hands than to write one to generate random or constrained hands (spoken by someone who doesn't program anything more complicated that a VCR). I agree to a large extent. But one could write a program to look for borderline cases and flag them, and print out the evaluation of ZAR points, LTC, Rule of 20, etc. Just to compare. And generating constrained hands might not be as simple as one may think. You can always brute force it, generating lots of hands, and discarding those that don't meet the criteria. But to generate a hand that meets your constraints without brute force requires some trade offs. Richard Pavlicek has an article on this: http://www.rpbridge.net/7z71.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted September 23, 2004 Report Share Posted September 23, 2004 What is bridgelab.exe? I looked for it on the web and couldn't find it.I would find it useful if there was some software I could use to generate lots of hands and save them as text files so I could write a program to analyze them. You can't beat Dealer, originally written by Hans van Staveren http://www.dombo.org/henk/dealer.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syl20 Posted September 25, 2004 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2004 Ok.I'am also sure we don't apply corrections the same way.Here is my "algorithm":(1) North is the one with 5+♠, 12-17Hcp(2) I calculate raw Zar points for both hands(3) I correct for trump honour(s) holding only for the South hand: one for trump 10 or higher (maximum 2 points).(4) I correct for trump length for both North (over 5) and South (over 3), allowing 3, 2 or 1 points per additional trump for void, singleton or doubleton.(5) I correct for honours in short suits (in my arbitrary choice and we surely differ here):Jack doubleton or singleton = 0Queen doubleton or singleton = 1King singleton = 2 (instead of 4)King doubleton remains unchangedHere are the results computed on 18000 boards:Tricks % Boards ZarCorr 5 0,0005 46,2 6 0,0052 48,15385 7 0,0342 48,93859 8 0,0971 51,1359423274974 9 0,2009 53,5435540069686 10 0,2644 56,499621785174 11 0,2273 59,9111306643203 12 0,1273 63,509033778476 13 0,0431 68,04176 ZarCorr % Tricks 42 0,0003 7,33333333333333 43 0,0013 6,61538461538462 44 0,0017 6,88235294117647 45 0,0051 7,49019607843137 46 0,0088 7,54545454545455 47 0,0152 7,85526315789474 48 0,0182 8,14285714285714 49 0,0279 8,28673835125448 50 0,0374 8,52673796791444 51 0,0437 8,87871853546911 52 0,0549 9,04189435336976 53 0,0622 9,2491961414791 54 0,0673 9,44873699851412 55 0,0692 9,6893063583815 56 0,0681 9,92511013215859 57 0,0639 10,1533646322379 58 0,0646 10,3452012383901 59 0,062 10,5612903225806 60 0,0551 10,7186932849365 61 0,0483 10,9606625258799 62 0,0439 11,0728929384966 63 0,0365 11,2931506849315 64 0,0308 11,4318181818182 65 0,0245 11,6367346938776 66 0,0224 11,8080357142857 67 0,0151 11,8211920529801 68 0,0149 11,9395973154362 69 0,0108 12,1759259259259 70 0,0082 12,3292682926829 71 0,0038 12,4210526315789 72 0,0049 12,4081632653061 73 0,0027 12,6666666666667 74 0,0018 12,8333333333333 75 0,0013 12,6923076923077 76 0,0007 13 As you asked me, 12 boards do follow... :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syl20 Posted September 25, 2004 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2004 ... here are some boards [board "1"] S AJ6543 H Q82 D K74 C KS T S 982H JT75 H A94D 932 D T5C AQT87 C J6542 S KQ7 H K63 D AQJ86 C 93 [board "2"] S AKQ52 H AK8 D 642 C 97S 96 S JT8H J742 H QT5D J9753 D KT8C T5 C KJ63 S 743 H 963 D AQ C AQ842 [board "3"] S AJ852 H A832 D A62 C QS Q S K763H KJ7 H 4D QJ9854 D KT7C T83 C 97652 S T94 H QT965 D 3 C AKJ4 [board "4"] S AT9742 H Q3 D KQJ C KTS Q6 S 5H KJ8762 H AT954D T952 D A864C Q C 632 S KJ83 H D 73 C AJ98754 [board "5"] S K86532 H AQJ5 D K C 53S J S Q7H T9762 H 43D Q42 D AJ8753C KQT2 C 864 S AT94 H K8 D T96 C AJ97 [board "6"] S Q9865 H AKQ6 D JT C T6S A S T72H T75 H J98D A8765 D KQ932C J982 C K3 S KJ43 H 432 D 4 C AQ754 [board "7"] S AJT76 H Q96 D 83 C KQ6S 82 S 94H AJ H K87432D AJT6542 D 9C J9 C T752 S KQ53 H T5 D KQ7 C A843 [board "8"] S AK985 H AJT7 D 6 C T42S 642 S 73H K93 H Q84D Q742 D AK853C A97 C K86 S QJT H 652 D JT9 C QJ53 [board "9"] S AK9862 H AJ6 D 87 C Q2S T4 S 5H Q9732 H K84D J43 D KQ62C J93 C K7654 S QJ73 H T5 D AT95 C AT8 [board "10"] S AK764 H K D JT864 C KJS 2 S Q3H 765 H AJT932D 972 D A3C A97653 C T42 S JT985 H Q84 D KQ5 C Q8 [board "5000"] S AQ976 H J5 D AQ8 C JT7S 84 S 3H AQT732 H K94D 652 D J973C 52 C AKQ64 S KJT52 H 86 D KT4 C 983 [board "10000"] S K9832 H A4 D AQ8 C K54S AT7 S 64H J95 H KT2D JT7532 D 94C 3 C AQJ872 S QJ5 H Q8763 D K6 C T96 ... and the results from "gib.exe":Board# Tricks Zar Zar(North) Zar(South) ZarCorr Corr 1 11 61 31 30 63 2 2 12 60 33 27 59 -1 3 11 60 34 26 60 0 4 12 62 32 30 67 5 5 11 59 32 27 62 3 6 11 53 27 26 56 3 7 9 54 26 28 57 3 8 9 45 30 15 47 2 9 11 57 32 25 60 3 10 10 56 34 22 56 0 5000 8 49 29 20 52 310000 8 53 33 20 55 2 Hoping to converge soon with you. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syl20 Posted September 25, 2004 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2004 Sorry i don't know how to handle the format for boards. The order is North and the four last are South's hand. In the middle are East and West.Simpler would be that i send you the original files if you wish ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.