1eyedjack Posted September 19, 2004 Report Share Posted September 19, 2004 Ooops, one serious drawback of Granville that I reckon lately: The 4-4 spades fit can be buried easily in competition. 1H-1S-(3C);?? Holding AQxx-KJ10xx-Kx-xx, opener can't investigate the possibility of spade fit as he is only minimum, and he is forced to pass. You can't be sure whether there is a good fit in spades or not. If responder has started with a standard 1S, then you can give a raise here. Maybe opener should play takeout double when the opponent sandwiches. It can help somehow, but you would probably perform less well than the standard bidders when there is a 4-4 spade fit and competition. It is true that you can miss a Spade fit in these circumstances. But you will not lose (to use your hyperbole) a "good" Spade fit. The Spade fit, if it is lost, will be no better than an 8 card fit. If you have game in Spades on your way I reckon you will still get there after 3C overcall (bigger danger would be 4C overcall). If you don't have game on then you are Law-protected, if they have competed to the 3 level when there are only 8 card fits floating around ... content to defend. And the problem is further diminished by the added power to your side in competition when the auction starts 1H-(P)-1N-(3C) To my mind, the biggest drawback to Granville is the difficulty of creating forcing sequences after 1H-1S when responder has a strong balanced hand with 4 Spades. Still, all methods have their drawbacks, I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.