gnasher Posted September 28, 2012 Report Share Posted September 28, 2012 The ACBL rule is about irregularities in general. For example, it makes perfect sense when applied to an auction where one opponent is barred because of an earlier infraction. I agree with Tim that in the specific case of an uncorrected insufficient bid you're in a different auction from any other, so it appears to be legal to have agreements that are specific to that auction. But I wouldn't want to try to persaude an ACBL director to agree with me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted September 28, 2012 Report Share Posted September 28, 2012 Going back to QuantumCat's question from 2011, a Google search for "australian bridge federation law 40B3" produced this ABF regulation:Prior agreement by a partnership to vary its understanding during the auction or play following a question asked, a response to a question or an irregularity committed by its own side is prohibited. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.