benlessard Posted May 19, 2011 Report Share Posted May 19, 2011 all white (1S)-2H-(3H)-??? Axx---KJ98xxxxxx What is your plan ? Does playing lead directing raise is more important than natural " potential sacrifice" bids ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
menggq Posted May 19, 2011 Report Share Posted May 19, 2011 3♥ might mean limited raise with ♠ support,PD sd hv short ♠ more likely singleton,i wd bid 5♦ and let opps guess:DBL?5♠?PASS?FORCING PASS?... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted May 19, 2011 Report Share Posted May 19, 2011 4♠ is a heavy favorite to go down. The plan is to let it be then. If opps skillfully manage to stop in 3, then I'd try 4♦. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayin801 Posted May 19, 2011 Report Share Posted May 19, 2011 If X was lead directing (and not showing real hearts) I'd bid that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted May 21, 2011 Report Share Posted May 21, 2011 Double should show hearts here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benlessard Posted May 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 22, 2011 I bid 4D here planning to X 4S for a unusual lead. 5D is -1 and 4S make despite the H lead, (LHO has a D void so i cannot get to partner hand a 2nd time + im ruffing a slow H trick). But our disagreement is should 4D always show a H tol (is it forcing ?) Vul or by a passed hand 4D should be a lead directing raise but NV 4D as and invite to sacrifice has to be more important no ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P0STM0RTEM Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 It may seem a little convoluted, but what I like to do is play transfers at and beyond the level of the cue bid after which if advancer later supports overcaller is just a lead director should the opponents take the auction. Here's how it works: 1♠-(2♥)-3♥-(4♣) to show ♦'s or a ♦-lead directing raise of overcaller's ♥s. IMHO, the best of both worlds are achieved. The only reasonable bids I see available to actually provide partner an inference to lead their own ♥ suit would be [Pass] or [X]. I have to fully agree with 'whereagles' and hope to either get the ♦s in later and look for either a lead of a ♥ or ♦A or Q or another with at least one visible in dummy. I'm just not sure how much of a favorite the ops game is to fail. Change the rounded cards in the hand around to: ♠Axx ♥xxx ♦KJ98xxxx ♣---I'd have to chose to ask for a ♣ lead here via a 3♠ call - when rather liking a suit, but also having a void the decision about which to feature gets tough. Rest of the available bids and meanings for those curious:After 1♠-(2♥)-3♥- 3♠* = ♣'s or a ♣-lead directing ♥ raise3NT = To play4♣* = ♦'s or a ♦-lead directing ♥ raise4♦ = Good ♥ raise4♥ = Preemptive ♥ raise * any subsequent ♥ bid by the transferer CANCELs the expectation of a long suit alternative sacrifice and instead requests the directed lead to help defeat the contract whether it's later doubled or not. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.