Jump to content

Hand from Long Beach #2


pclayton

  

22 members have voted

  1. 1. Hand from Long Beach #2

    • Pass - Leave opps in low scoring minor
      10
    • 1 Heart - Get them in early
      2
    • 1N - Right on values if a little soft
      7
    • 2 Clubs - Best suit and chance of fit
      3


Recommended Posts

I voted defend 1. The biggest risk here involved here is that I am short in diamonds, so partner maybe trapping, but since we are vulnerable and they are not, I think there is much, much less chance he is trapping.

 

The second smaller risk is that you can compete to maybe 3C and if they go to 3D they go down. But on the otherhand, you are vul, so 2C down one, for instance is -100 while if they make just 2D, they only get 90.

 

So while I am passing 1D, I don't think I will get rich defending 1D. What hands can west hold? A huge balanced hand or very good hand with running diamonds? He may then be set to make +120 or +150 in notrump if I reopen. They may have an eight or longer spade fit, and if I reopen, they may find it. Those are the good ones for me. Probably what will happen is I will reopen and they will outbid me in diamonds (or spades) and get the same score they could have had.

 

Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite the huge pass vote passing a non-vul 1 bid at pairs looks like losing strategy to me. It seems clear to bid a balancing 1NT (11-14 or 11-16, whatever you play) and I would not describe it as "soft" as the poll implies.

 

Partner can easily hold a 3343/2353 13-count and, although this means they have an 8-card spade fit, does not mean that we should not have a making contract.

 

Incidently I am surprised that some play Raptor 1NT in the protective position - what is double for?

 

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite the huge pass vote passing a non-vul 1 bid at pairs looks like losing strategy to me. It seems clear to bid a balancing 1NT (11-14 or 11-16, whatever you play) and I would not describe it as "soft" as the poll implies.

 

Partner can easily hold a 3343/2353 13-count and, although this means they have an 8-card spade fit, does not mean that we should not have a making contract.

 

Incidently I am surprised that some play Raptor 1NT in the protective position - what is double for?

 

Paul

Paul, here are the results of a random selection of 1000 1D contracts (no double), and without regard to vulnerablity. The MP scores given are for the defending side.

 

Score  Matchpoint %

-500      0.00

-400      55.43

-300      39.22

-200      22.90

-150      26.04

-100      48.30

-50      47.68

0         51.43

70         54.93

90         52.97

110      57.06

130      44.49

150      39.89

170      31.70

190      6.90

 

The average contract here is slightly below 50% (when group by esult). For instance, there was only one down five vulnerable, which was a bottom for the defense, and yet when I averaged each individual hand, the average is just slightly over 50% to defend (49.7 versus 50.3). So passing, as I said, doesn't seem to be the road to riches. But here, you might think you have the odds stacked in your favor by passing. Your parnter almost has to have the PERFECT pass hand for the balance to work out. While there are many, many hands where, in fact they are in the wrong spot. So on average, you probably should balance, but here, the odds are all wrong.

 

I am generaly lothe to let them play in an uncontested auction. This one with my spade shortness (and what I assume will be less than full value Spade QJ, and diamond Q), I think pass is right (well I already said that, didn't I). I suspect pass doesn't work out so well, or the hand wouldn't be posted here, but that doens't change my opinion of what is the right bid.

 

Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite the huge pass vote passing a non-vul 1 bid at pairs looks like losing strategy to me. It seems clear to bid a balancing 1NT (11-14 or 11-16, whatever you play) and I would not describe it as "soft" as the poll implies.

 

Partner can easily hold a 3343/2353 13-count and, although this means they have an 8-card spade fit, does not mean that we should not have a making contract.

 

Incidently I am surprised that some play Raptor 1NT in the protective position - what is double for?

 

Paul

Paul, here are the results of a random selection of 1000 1D contracts (no double), and without regard to vulnerablity. The MP scores given are for the defending side.

 

Score  Matchpoint %

-500      0.00

-400      55.43

-300      39.22

-200      22.90

-150      26.04

-100      48.30

-50      47.68

0         51.43

70         54.93

90         52.97

110      57.06

130      44.49

150      39.89

170      31.70

190      6.90

 

The average contract here is slightly below 50% (when group by esult). For instance, there was only one down five vulnerable, which was a bottom for the defense, and yet when I averaged each individual hand, the average is just slightly over 50% to defend (49.7 versus 50.3). So passing, as I said, doesn't seem to be the road to riches. But here, you might think you have the odds stacked in your favor by passing. Your parnter almost has to have the PERFECT pass hand for the balance to work out. While there are many, many hands where, in fact they are in the wrong spot. So on average, you probably should balance, but here, the odds are all wrong.

 

I am generaly lothe to let them play in an uncontested auction. This one with my spade shortness (and what I assume will be less than full value Spade QJ, and diamond Q), I think pass is right (well I already said that, didn't I). I suspect pass doesn't work out so well, or the hand wouldn't be posted here, but that doens't change my opinion of what is the right bid.

 

Ben

Thanks all for the responses. I passed as well and caught partner with about as awful a hand as I could find:

 

Kxxx

AJx

Jxx

QTx

 

1N, 2C and even 1H work out great. Further, the opponents have a nice diamond fit, and no significant spade fit to speak of. RHO passed on: 98x, Txxx, Axx, xxx. Opener had ATxx, Qx, Kxxxx, Ax and made +70 for a terrible score for us.

 

I agree with Ben; partner's hand was about as good as I could have hoped for. Whats really bad is that partner's 4333 shape will discourage him and keep us low.

 

Phil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stratified Pairs - Vul vs Not

 

QJ

K7xx

Qx

KJxxx

 

LHO....CHO....RHO....You

1....pass....pass....?

The question is, who has all the spades? Partner doesn't have 5 or he had bid them. If he has only 3, opps have an 8-card fit.

I don'T like my Qs and Js playing myself, but better defending.

 

Therefore: No doubt: PASS

 

cheers

 

Al

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stratified Pairs - Vul vs Not

 

QJ

K7xx

Qx

KJxxx

 

LHO....CHO....RHO....You

1....pass....pass....?

1N seems clear, though I'd be happy at equal vulnerability

 

Defending 1 with shortness can't be right

2 seems too unilateral

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They might have spades, but that doesn't mean they will bid them. I won't argue that it may be statistically correct to pass, but at matchpoints, whenever there's the slightest indication the hand might be yours, you have to act. I've been in situations similar to this one and whenever I passed, the score was at best 40%.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stratified Pairs - Vul vs Not

 

QJ

K7xx

Qx

KJxxx

 

LHO....CHO....RHO....You

1....pass....pass....?

The question is, who has all the spades? Partner doesn't have 5 or he had bid them. If he has only 3, opps have an 8-card fit.

I don'T like my Qs and Js playing myself, but better defending.

 

Therefore: No doubt: PASS

 

cheers

 

Al

This assumes that partner will bid 1 on any 7-9ish point hand with 5 however poor the are. Even if the are KTxxx, most of the hands are not 1 overcalls.

 

Eric

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...