Jump to content

Void showing responses to Blackwood


mr1303

Recommended Posts

[hv=pc=n&s=sha93dk8642cakq63&d=n&v=b&b=13&a=1dp3cp3sp4dp4np]133|200[/hv]

 

3C was a strong jump shift. 4NT is 0314 RKCB

 

What say you here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not show my void even if I had a way to show it.

 

But I would like to respond 6 Ace RKCB, since I have a known 2-suiter. I would show 4 key cards with the kings of both clubs and diamonds counting as key cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=pc=n&s=sha93dk8642cakq63&d=n&v=b&b=13&a=1dp3cp3sp4dp4np]133|200[/hv]

 

3C was a strong jump shift. 4NT is 0314 RKCB

 

What say you here?

 

Well, if you want to show your void;

 

4NT---6x (x < our trump) = x suit void and odd number of keycards

4NT---6 of our trump = odd number of keycards + a suit above trump is void

4NT---5NT = even number of keycards + a void.

 

So in this hand IF you want to show a void , you bid 6. But as they said, that will hardly matter because if pd knows what he is doing, he should have A and A in order to ask 4NT. He definetely has control too, K or stiff. What matters will be Q for him if he wants to go grand, i would just respond keycards if i were you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=pc=n&s=sha93dk8642cakq63&d=n&v=b&b=13&a=1dp3cp3sp4dp4np]133|200[/hv]

 

3C was a strong jump shift. 4NT is 0314 RKCB

 

What say you here?

 

 

 

 

3KC: 5. That is what you agreed with partner.....

But I think, playing SAYC, 3 is wrong. I would have splintered: 3: partnership can now start a serie of control bidding, or whatever you agreed on a splinter.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1st point - if I'm not going to jump shift on these cards, with good 5 card support for partner, a side suit with a source of tricks and first round controls in all other suits, when are you going to jump shift?

 

2nd point

 

This was partner's hand. We had a misunderstanding in bidding the grand, but bid it anyway. How would you bid it?[hv=pc=n&n=sak63h6daqj53c952]133|100[/hv]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

something that would work is 1-2-3-5NT (GSF) however this would miss some good grands if partner has AJxxx

 

Those who play exclusion will have a comfortable 1-2-3-5 bidding

 

 

Now if you need to start with clubs it would go like this:

 

1-2

2-3

3NT-4

 

 

continuations depend on agreements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...