Jump to content

is it easy to reach 4H ?


benlessard

Recommended Posts

I'm surprised everyone is bidding only 2 with the North hand. That's the only conceivable way to miss game, because any stronger action will surely yield a game bid from South. Please don't tell me North passes. I mean, I'd rather be forced to blast 4 with North's hand than to bid only 2, and passing would be hopeless. 3 probably works fine.

 

I mean, if some joker told me they bid 3 by North as a splinter, implying a red two-suiter, my comment would be, "Wow, that's a big bid," not "are you insane?!?!?" Of course, I have a twinge of insanity.

 

BTW, I know that the double can be weak, but geez!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm surprised everyone is bidding only 2 with the North hand. That's the only conceivable way to miss game, because any stronger action will surely yield a game bid from South. Please don't tell me North passes. I mean, I'd rather be forced to blast 4 with North's hand than to bid only 2, and passing would be hopeless. 3 probably works fine.

 

I mean, if some joker told me they bid 3 by North as a splinter, implying a red two-suiter, my comment would be, "Wow, that's a big bid," not "are you insane?!?!?" Of course, I have a twinge of insanity.

 

BTW, I know that the double can be weak, but geez!

 

Ok, I yield; I change my call to a confident 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

North should definitely bid 2 with 6 HCP and 5 hearts, South cues 3, North bids 4 not a great final place but reasonable.

I would really count those two Ks as Aces there...ergo, 3 might not be a stretch. However, the OP hasn't specified the scoring and vulnerability and there's less incentive to bid 3 at MPs...

 

Edit:

 

I missaw the auction. A freebid of 2H is indeed enough to show this hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would really count those two Ks as Aces there...ergo, 3 might not be a stretch. However, the OP hasn't specified the scoring and vulnerability and there's less incentive to bid 3 at MPs...

 

I think no one is vulnerable that is indicated in the bidding by the white bar above all seats. Vulnerable players have red bars.

 

Its a pity that the forum software no longer asks for the method of scoring when entering a hand. Those of us who have been here a long time often omit that information, probably out of habit.

 

2 for me. For me this shows around 5-8 hcp with four or five hearts. Here I am maximum for this bid. South will not pass and game will be reached in comfort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an easier auction: balance 2NT, which typically is like 17-19 or so.

 

Then it's really a no-brainer.

Except that 2NT in the balancing position is 19+ - 21, and you don't have a stopper. Double, and when partner bids 2 like (s)he should, raise to 3. Then partner with a maximum goes to 4, and everybody's happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except that 3 shows four hearts, and you only have three. Normal would be a cuebid to show a strong hand without four hearts.

And you probably shouldn't DBL here with a dubious Q as part of your 18 HCP, but it looks like he did. I don't feel that the North hand is strong enough to bid 2, and I do expect South to support with a Max, even with only 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except that 2NT in the balancing position is 19+ - 21, and you don't have a stopper.

 

Maybe 2NT is 19-21 where you live. Here we go a bit lower, otherwise we'd never use the bid LOL.

 

Oh, and.. club stopper? I see you don't know me well :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol ?!? Seems like a perfectly reasonable albeit on the low end 2NT call.

 

Yep. But, here on these fora they have explained to me how the bid should have the values for the level forced. Something I never knew before, and haven't adopted after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep. But, here on these fora they have explained to me how the bid should have the values for the level forced. Something I never knew before, and haven't adopted after.

 

I guess you haven't as far as I'm concerned it is a preemptive call with a higher risk/reward variance. It is best used, as are most preemptive calls, when you are NV vs V.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...