blackshoe Posted April 6, 2011 Report Share Posted April 6, 2011 Ah. I missed that, because the idiots who wrote the chart put a reference to Stayman which doesn't include the parenthetical expression about 1NT-(X) right at the top of the chart, under "conventional calls". I would suggest that where the chart and the regulation differ, the regulation takes precedence, but in this case, and knowing how the great minds at ACBL HQ work in these matters, I expect they'd say the chart does. :( :o :blink: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.